On 4/24/2017 8:58 AM, Otis Gospodnetić wrote: > I'm really really surprised here. Back in 2013 we did a poll to see how > people were running Master-Slave (4.x back then) and SolrCloud was a bit > more popular than Master-Slave: > https://sematext.com/blog/2013/02/25/poll-solr-cloud-or-not/ > > Here is a fresh new poll with pretty much the same question - How do you > run your Solr? <https://twitter.com/sematext/status/854927627748036608> - > and guess what? SolrCloud is *not* at all a lot more prevalent than > Master-Slave.
I don't use *either* for my primary Solr installs. My indexes are distributed, with sharding maintained by my indexing code. Each copy of the index is independently updated, rather than relying on Solr features to replicate it. There are things I can do with this setup that would be much more difficult (and maybe impossible) with either SolrCloud or master-slave replication. Thanks, Shawn
