thanks Alex for taking out your valuable time and helping us to understand better.
Cheers! Kshitij On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 4:00 PM, alessandro.benedetti <a.benede...@sease.io> wrote: > It really depends on the schema change... > Any addition/deletion usually implies you can avoid re-indexing if you > don't > care the old documents will remain outdated. > But doing a type change, or a change to the data structures involved ( such > enabling docValues, norms ect ect) without a full re-index is a NO-GO ( you > can introduce a lot of subtle problems, not immediately visible) > > There have been a lot of discussions in the past to allow Solr manage > schema > changes on the fly ( with background jobs transparent to the > user/administrator), but nothing concrete yet that I know. > > Cheers > > > > ----- > --------------- > Alessandro Benedetti > Search Consultant, R&D Software Engineer, Director > Sease Ltd. - www.sease.io > -- > View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3. > nabble.com/Issue-with-facet-count-tp4329056p4329157.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
