Chris: OK, The whole DBQ thing baffles the heck out of me so this may be totally off base. But would committing help here? Or at least be worth a test?
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 4:28 PM, Chris Hostetter <hossman_luc...@fucit.org> wrote: > > : Thanks for replying. We are using Solr 6.1 version. Even I saw that it is > : bounded by 1K count, but after looking at heap dump I was amazed how can it > : keep more than 1K entries. But Yes I see around 7M entries according to > : heap dump and around 17G of memory occupied by BytesRef there. > > what exactly are you looking at when you say you see "7M entries" ? > > are you sure you aren't confusing the keys in oldDeletes with other > instances of BytesRef in the JVM? > > : It would be better to know why old deletes Map is used there. I am still > : digging, If I find something then I will share that. > > See UpdateLog.lookupVersion for where the mapping is used if you are > curious. Replicas recieving updates need to be able to verify (and in some > casees ask the leader via RTG) for the version used when a doc was deleted > in the even of concurrent/out-of-order updates for the same uniqueKey. > > > > -Hoss > http://www.lucidworks.com/
