So we've been having oddball replication issues between master and slave (Not SOLRCloud) for a few weeks now. Some days...everything lines up just fine. Other days things are off by a small amount between master and slave.
Here is the config on the MASTER server replication config: <!-- ReplicationHandler --> <requestHandler name="/replication" class="solr.ReplicationHandler" > <lst name="master"> <!--Replicate on 'startup' and 'commit'. 'optimize' is also a valid value for replicateAfter. --> <str name="replicateAfter">startup</str> <str name="replicateAfter">commit</str> <!--The default value of reservation is 10 secs.See the documentation below . Normally , you should not need to specify this --> <str name="commitReserveDuration">00:00:10</str> </lst> <!-- keep only 1 backup. Using this parameter precludes using the "numberToKeep" request parameter. (Solr3.6 / Solr4.0)--> <!-- (For this to work in conjunction with "backupAfter" with Solr 3.6.0, see bug fix https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3361 )--> <str name="maxNumberOfBackups">1</str> </requestHandler> Here is the SLAVE server replication config: <requestHandler name="/replication" class="solr.ReplicationHandler" > <lst name="slave"> <!--fully qualified url to the master core. It is possible to pass on this as a request param for the fetchindex command--> <str name="masterUrl">http://server01:8080/solr/${solr.core.name}</str> <!--Interval in which the slave should poll master .Format is HH:mm:ss . If this is absent slave does not poll automatically. But a fetchindex can be triggered from the admin or the http API --> <str name="pollInterval">00:01:00</str> </lst> </requestHandler> It seems very sporadic at best. Sometimes I can manually click "Replicate Now" from the replication page in the SOLR UI and it will work, sometimes it does nothing. Sometimes I can go to the master server, and if the "Optimize" button is available and I click it....it will replicate as soon as the Optimization is done. Is this a bug in SOLR? Could we possibly have some settings out of whack here? I've been digging around online for a bit and not finding much info here. This is on an older version of SOLR though, so wondering if maybe it used to be a bug? Thanks! Scott