So we've been having oddball replication issues between master and slave (Not
SOLRCloud) for a few weeks now. Some days...everything lines up just fine.
Other days things are off by a small amount between master and slave.
Here is the config on the MASTER server replication config:
<!-- ReplicationHandler -->
<requestHandler name="/replication" class="solr.ReplicationHandler" >
<lst name="master">
<!--Replicate on 'startup' and 'commit'. 'optimize' is also a valid value
for replicateAfter. -->
<str name="replicateAfter">startup</str>
<str name="replicateAfter">commit</str>
<!--The default value of reservation is 10 secs.See the documentation
below . Normally , you should not need to specify this -->
<str name="commitReserveDuration">00:00:10</str>
</lst>
<!-- keep only 1 backup. Using this parameter precludes using the
"numberToKeep" request parameter. (Solr3.6 / Solr4.0)-->
<!-- (For this to work in conjunction with "backupAfter" with Solr 3.6.0,
see bug fix https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3361 )-->
<str name="maxNumberOfBackups">1</str>
</requestHandler>
Here is the SLAVE server replication config:
<requestHandler name="/replication" class="solr.ReplicationHandler" >
<lst name="slave">
<!--fully qualified url to the master core. It is possible to pass on
this as a request param for the fetchindex command-->
<str name="masterUrl">http://server01:8080/solr/${solr.core.name}</str>
<!--Interval in which the slave should poll master .Format is HH:mm:ss .
If this is absent slave does not poll automatically.
But a fetchindex can be triggered from the admin or the http API -->
<str name="pollInterval">00:01:00</str>
</lst>
</requestHandler>
It seems very sporadic at best. Sometimes I can manually click "Replicate Now"
from the replication page in the SOLR UI and it will work, sometimes it does
nothing. Sometimes I can go to the master server, and if the "Optimize" button
is available and I click it....it will replicate as soon as the Optimization is
done.
Is this a bug in SOLR? Could we possibly have some settings out of whack here?
I've been digging around online for a bit and not finding much info here.
This is on an older version of SOLR though, so wondering if maybe it used to be
a bug?
Thanks!
Scott