Getting streaming expression and SQL working in non-SolrCloud mode is my top priority right now.
I'm testing the first parts of https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10200 today and will be committing soon. The first functionality delivered will be the significantTerms Streaming Expression. Here is a sample query: expr=significantTerms(enron, q="from:tana.jo...@enron.com", field="to", limit="20")&enron.shards=http://localhost:8983/solr/enron Notice the enron.shards http param. This provides the shards for the "enron" collection. This will release as part of the first release of the significantTerms expression in Solr 6.5. Solr 6.6 will likely have support for all stream source and parallel SQL/JDBC. Joel Bernstein http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 2:19 PM, OTH <omer.t....@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > Yes, I was trying to use it with a non-cloud setup. > > Basically, our application probably won't be requiring cloud features; > however, it would be extremely helpful to use JDBC with Solr. > > Of course, we don't mind using SolrCloud if that's what is needed for JDBC. > > Are there any drawbacks to using SolrCloud, if a distributed setup probably > won't be required? > > Much thanks > > On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 12:13 AM, Alexandre Rafalovitch <arafa...@gmail.com > > > wrote: > > > I believe JDBC requires streams, which requires SolrCloud, which > > requires Collections (even if it is a single-core collection). > > > > Are you trying to use it with non-cloud setup? > > > > Regards, > > Alex. > > ---- > > http://www.solr-start.com/ - Resources for Solr users, new and > experienced > > > > > > On 8 March 2017 at 14:02, OTH <omer.t....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > From the examples I am seeing online and in the reference guide ( > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Solr+ > > JDBC+-+SQuirreL+SQL), > > > I can only see Solr JDBC being used against a collection. Is it > possible > > > however to use it with a core? What should the JDBC URL be like in > that > > > case? > > > > > > Thanks > > >
