Actually, the main cross-references are from the solrconfig.xml, and primarily from the Update Request Handler chain that creates the "schemaless" effect. Then, I think you also have highlighters, etc.
I did that full analysis as a presentation at the last Solr Revolution: https://www.slideshare.net/arafalov/rebuilding-solr-6-examples-layer-by-layer-lucenesolrrevolution-2016 Regards, Alex. ---- http://www.solr-start.com/ - Resources for Solr users, new and experienced On 7 March 2017 at 17:18, Shawn Heisey <apa...@elyograg.org> wrote: > On 3/7/2017 1:32 PM, Phil Scadden wrote: >> >> I would have to say the "basic-config" seems distinctly more than basic. >> It is still a huge file. I thought perhaps I could delete every unused field >> type, but worried there were some "system" dependencies. > > > This is definitely true. Solr example configs tend towards including > "everything and the kitchen sink". Although this is good at illustrating > everything that Solr can do, it is also VERY overwhelming to new users. I > have found that in my production configs, I tend to strip almost everything > out and make them very lean. I have kept a number of the schema fieldType > definitions from the example, particularly those for basic data types, such > as numeric fields. > > Most of the dependencies in a schema will be contained within the schema > itself -- fieldTypes that are referenced by field definitions, etc. There > are a few other possible dependencies, such as a default field parameter in > a search handler definition that lives in solrconfig.xml. > > Thanks, > Shawn >
