Yes, 512 MB is far too small. I’m surprised it even starts. We run with 8 Gb.
wunder Walter Underwood wun...@wunderwood.org http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog) > On Feb 14, 2017, at 7:39 AM, Leon STRINGER <leon.strin...@ntlworld.com> wrote: > >> >> On 14 February 2017 at 14:44 Michael Kuhlmann <k...@solr.info> wrote: >> >> >> Wow, running 36 cores with only half a gigabyte of heap memory is >> *really* optimistic! >> >> I'd raise the heap size to some gigabytes at least and see how it's >> working then. >> > > I'll try increasing the heap size and see if I get the problem again. > > Is core quantity a big issue? As opposed to the size of the cores? Yes, > there's > 36 but some relate to largely inactive web sites so the average size (assuming > my "Master (Searching)" way of calculating this is correct) is less than 4 > MB. I > naively assumed a heap size-related issue would result from larger data sets. > > Thanks for your recommendation, > > Leon Stringer >
