I meant "update frequency" more than schedule. If one group of content
is updated once per day and the another every ten minutes, and most of
the traffic is going to the slow collection, splitting them could help.

wunder

On 8/8/08 8:25 AM, "Walter Underwood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Try putting them all in one index. Your fields can be s1_name for
> schema 1, s2_name for schema 2, and so on.
> 
> The only reason to have separate indexes is if each group of
> content has a different update schedule and if you have high
> traffic (over 1M queries/day).
> 
> wunder
> 
> On 8/8/08 8:19 AM, "Kashyap, Raghu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
>> Not sure if this will work for you but you can have 3 cores (using
>> multicore) and have your solr server or the client decide on to which
>> core it should be hitting. With this approach your can have separate
>> schema.xml & solrconfig.xml for each of the cores & obviously separate
>> index in each core.
>> 
>> -Raghu
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: anshuljohri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2008 5:19 PM
>> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Multiple Indexes
>> 
>> 
>> Both the cases are there. As i said i need to index 3 indexes. So 2
>> indexes
>> have same schema but other one has different. More specification is like
>> this --
>> 
>> I have 3 indexes. In which 2 indexes have same data model but the way
>> these
>> are indexed is different. So i need to fire query from backend on
>> individual
>> indexes based on input. But the 3rd index has diff schema also. Again
>> the
>> query will be fired on this index based on input.
>> 
>> So my question is how can i handle this situation. Thru configuring
>> multiple
>> instances of Solr/Tomcat if ya than how? else what are the other ways on
>> Solr 1.2
>> 
>> -Anshul
>> 
>> 
>> zayhen wrote:
>>> 
>>> Oh,
>>> 
>>> Sorry!
>>> 
>>> Can you be a little more specific? Do these indexes have different
>>> schemas,
>>> or do they represent the same data model?
>>> 
>>> 2008/8/7 anshuljohri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks zayhen for such a quick response but am not talking about
>>>> sharding.
>>>> I
>>>> have requirement of indexing 3 indexes. Need to do query on diff
>> indexes
>>>> based on input.
>>>> 
>>>> -Anshul
>>>> 
>>>> zayhen wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 2008/8/7 anshuljohri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hi everybody!
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I need to create multiple indexes lets say 3 due to project
>>>> requirement.
>>>>>> And
>>>>>> the query will be fired from backend on different indexes based on
>>>> input.
>>>>>> I
>>>>>> can't do it in one index with the help of "fq" parameter. As i
>> have
>>>>>> already
>>>>>> thought on it but thats of no use.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> I assume you are talking about sharding. Go 1.3-dev. It runs smooth
>> in
>>>> my
>>>>> environment!
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> So i searched a lot in this forum but couldn't get satisfactory
>>>> answer.
>>>> I
>>>>>> found that there are 3 ways to do it. In which 2 ways are not
>>>> applicable
>>>>>> in
>>>>>> 1.2 version. So i have to go with Multiple Tomcat instances option
>> as
>>>> in
>>>>>> multiple webapps config.
>>>>>> But still am not clear whether I need 3 diff solrConfig.xml &
>>>> schema.xml
>>>>>> or
>>>>>> I can do it with symlinks.
>>>>>> Is there any tutorial or some reading material for this. Can
>> anybody
>>>> plz
>>>>>> help me out?
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks is advance
>>>>>> -Anshul Johri
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> View this message in context:
>>>>>> http://www.nabble.com/Multiple-Indexes-tp18880284p18880284.html
>>>>>> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> Alexander Ramos Jardim
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> -----
>>>>> RPG da Ilha
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> View this message in context:
>>>> http://www.nabble.com/Multiple-Indexes-tp18880284p18880771.html
>>>> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Alexander Ramos Jardim
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -----
>>> RPG da Ilha 
>>> 
> 

Reply via email to