Hi folks,

Thanks for the replies.  I think I'm getting closer now.

I'm using the PHP library provided in JIRA, and I am calling commit()
from it.  Unfortunately, I can't see if it is working or not...

I'm trying to get logging working in jetty for a multi-instance server,
but that's a separate nightmare.

To understand correctly:
 If you don't commit after making an update, you shouldn't see those
documents you've added in the index when you search.  Is that correct?

 If so, than I am committing just fine, as they show up, but the commit
script is still not being called.

Best,
jacob
Alexander Ramos Jardim wrote:
> You can configure the autocommit feature in solrconfig.xml to get commit to
> work from time to time or based in the number of documents added to your
> index.
> 
> 2008/8/7 Jacob Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm using the XML based update interface, and feeding requests to update
>> the index via jetty.  It all works great, however now I'm trying to get
>> replication running, and here's what I understand:
>>
>> 1. An index update comes in.
>> 2. Solr runs the commit script
>> 3. a post-commit event is specified in solrconfig.xml:
>>
>> <listener event="postCommit" class="solr.RunExecutableListener">
>>      <str name="exe">snapshooter</str>
>> ....
>>
>> 4. This creates a snapshot of the index and puts it in data/SNAPSHOT...
>> 5. The slaves run on cron, ssh in to the master, and basically just ls
>> the data dir, find if there is a new snapshot and rsync it
>> 6. the slaves "warm" the index and swap it.
>> 7. snapcleaner runs on both machines to clear out old snapshots.
>>
>> Okay... so this all makes sense, and I can sorta make it work, however,
>> the commit is never run by itself when the index is updated.  I have to
>> manually call the commit script from the command line to get it to happen.
>>
>> Do I have to call something additional via the webservice?
>>
>> Am I missing a config option in solrconfig.xml? (I'm using the example,
>> so I wouldn't think so).
>>
>> Thanks a lot!
>> Jacob
>>
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to