because you have this as an analyzed field rather than a string field I think.
Best,
Erick
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 2:56 PM, Kris Musshorn <mussho...@comcast.net> wrote:
> This q={!prefix f=metatag.date}2016-10 returns zero records
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: KRIS MUSSHORN [mailto:mussho...@comcast.net]
> Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2016 3:00 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: field set up help
>
> so if the field was named metatag.date q={!prefix f=metatag.date}2016-10....
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
> From: "Erik Hatcher" <erik.hatc...@gmail.com>
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2016 2:46:32 PM
> Subject: Re: field set up help
>
> Given what you’ve said, my hunch is you could make the query like this:
>
> q={!prefix f=field_name}2016-10
>
> tada! ?!
>
> there’s nothing wrong with indexing dates as text like that, as long as your
> queries are performantly possible. And in the case of the query type you
> mentioned, the text/string’ish indexing you’ve done is suited quite well to
> prefix queries to grab dates by year, year-month, and year-month-day. But
> you could, if needed to get more sophisticated with date queries
> (DateRangeField is my new favorite) you can leverage
> ParseDateFieldUpdateProcessorFactory without having to change the incoming
> format.
>
> Erik
>
>
>
>
>> On Nov 17, 2016, at 1:55 PM, KRIS MUSSHORN <mussho...@comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>> I have a field in solr 5.4.1 that has values like:
>> 2016-10-15
>> 2016-09-10
>> 2015-10-12
>> 2010-09-02
>>
>> Yes it is a date being stored as text.
>>
>> I am getting the data onto solr via nutch and the metatag plug in.
>>
>> The data is coming directly from the website I am crawling and I am not able
>> to change the data at the source to something more palpable.
>>
>> The field is set in solr to be of type TextField that is indexed, tokenized,
>> stored, multivalued and norms are omitted.
>>
>> Both the index and query analysis chains contain just the whitespace
>> tokenizer factory and the lowercase filter factory.
>>
>> I need to be able to query for 2016-10 and only match 2016-10-15.
>>
>> Any ideas on how to set this up?
>>
>> TIA
>>
>> Kris
>>
>
>
>
