Hi Midas,
You can boost result by reciprocal value of price, but that does not
guaranty that there will not be irrelevant result first because of it is
cheap.
Emir
On 14.11.2016 11:19, Midas A wrote:
Thanks for replying ,
i want to maintain relevancy along with price sorting \
for example if i search "nike shoes"
According to relevance "nike shoes" come first then tshirt (other
product) from nike .
and now if we sort the results tshirt from nike come on the top . this is
some thing that is not users intent .
In this situation we have to adopt mediocre approach that does not change
users intent .
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 2:38 PM, Emir Arnautovic <
emir.arnauto...@sematext.com> wrote:
Hi Midas,
Sorting by price means that score (~relevancy) is ignored/used as second
sorting criteria. My assumption is that you have long tail of false
positives causing sort by price to sort cheap, unrelated items first just
because they matched by some stop word.
Or I missed your question?
Emir
On 14.11.2016 06:39, Midas A wrote:
Hi,
we are in e-commerce business and we have to give price sort
functionality
.
what logic should we use that does not break the relevance .
please give the query for the same assuming dummy fields.
--
Monitoring * Alerting * Anomaly Detection * Centralized Log Management
Solr & Elasticsearch Support * http://sematext.com/
--
Monitoring * Alerting * Anomaly Detection * Centralized Log Management
Solr & Elasticsearch Support * http://sematext.com/
