On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 7:22 PM, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > : I'd prefer that the community decide on the best logo. > : Choosing #3 on a simple majority when there were 6 variants of #2 to > : split the vote, doesn't feel fair. > : The fair thing to me looks like a runoff between #2 and #3. > > Agreed, but I'd suggest including #9 as well. > > Between #9,10&11 there was fairly decent vote close to what #3 got and > while #10&11 both have some fine detail that's hard to reproduce in > smaller versions, 9 is both simple to scale and fairly representative of > the group. > > A simple 1person==1vote runoff of #2, #3, and #9 lasting 72 hours should > be quick and fairly representative.
There's still the splitting-the-vote possibility. Not a huge deal, but in this specific case, it's easy to eliminate if we want (give people a first and second choice again). -Yonik
