thank you very much for the quick answare.


Yes, I am not indexing between request.



How can I risync two or all replicas?

If I look the overviews in the shard menu (attached the screenshot) I see that 
the num docs are mismatched.





Davide Isoardi

eCube S.r.l.

isoa...@ecubecenter.it<mailto:isoa...@ecubecenter.it>

http://www.ecubecenter.it

Tel.  +390113999301

Mobile +393288204915

Fax. +390113999309





Informativa ai sensi del Decr.Lgs Privacy n.196/2003

ECUBE tratta i dati personali secondo quanto specificato nella pagina “Privacy 
Policy” disponibile su http://www.ecubecenter.it/privacy.pdf. Le informazioni 
contenute nel presente messaggio sono destinate esclusivamente al/ai 
destinatario/i indicato/i. Qualora riceviate il presente messaggio per errore, 
vi preghiamo di voler cortesemente darcene notizia via e-mail 
(i...@ecubecenter.it<mailto:i...@ecubecenter.it>) e di provvedere ad eliminare 
il messaggio ricevuto erroneamente, essendo illegittimo ed illecito ogni 
diverso utilizzo.





-----Messaggio originale-----

Da: Shawn Heisey [mailto:apa...@elyograg.org]

Inviato: venerdì 14 ottobre 2016 14:32

A: solr-user@lucene.apache.org<mailto:solr-user@lucene.apache.org>

Oggetto: Re: Incongruent results of numdocs



On 10/14/2016 3:35 AM, Davide Isoardi wrote:

> I have indexed more than 1 million of docs on a SolrCloud collections whit 5 
> shards and 2 replicas.

>

> After the indexing if I try to query (many times) q=id:*&rows=0 I have 
> different result for the document number founds.

>

> Why the result is not the same for all querys?



Assuming that you are not indexing new documents between requests, there are 
two reasons for this problem:



1) You have documents with the same uniqueKey value in more than one of your 
shards.  This typically happens when the router on the collection is set to 
"implicit" ... which basically means "manual."

2) Your two replicas are out of sync, which might have any number of causes.



Side note:  "q=id:*" is a very inefficient query.  You would be better off with 
a range query -- "q=id:[* TO *]".  That would be faster and use less memory.  
If the id field is your uniqueKey, then an even faster query and 100% 
equivalent query is the one for all docs -- "q=*:*".



Thanks,

Shawn


Reply via email to