Ok, thanks Andrey.
On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 at 00:13 Kydryavtsev Andrey <werde...@yandex.ru> wrote: > Hello, Ryan > > > As it obvious from exception message - you are forced to use same instance > of Analyzer to all of spell checkers which should be conjuncted. > > How this instance is initialized inside SpellChecker instance could be > found here - > https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/blob/master/solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/spelling/SolrSpellChecker.java#L65 > > So one of possibilities to make it work - use same field for both spell > checkers. solrconfig.xml could looks like this: > > <lst name="spellchecker"> > <str name="name">default</str> > <str name="classname">solr.DirectSolrSpellChecker</str> > <str name="field">field_for_spell_check</str> > … > </lst> > > > <lst name="spellchecker"> > <str name="name">wordbreak</str> > <str name="classname">solr.WordBreakSolrSpellChecker</str> > <str name="field"> field_for_spell_check </str> > …. > </lst> > > 23.09.2016, 12:13, "Ryan Yacyshyn" <ryan.yacys...@gmail.com>: > > Hi everyone, > > > > I'm looking at using two different implementations of spell checking > > together: DirectSolrSpellChecker and FileBasedSpellChecker but I get the > > following error: > > > > msg: "All checkers need to use the same Analyzer.", > > trace: "java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: All checkers need to use the > > same Analyzer. at > > > org.apache.solr.spelling.ConjunctionSolrSpellChecker.addChecker(ConjunctionSolrSpellChecker.java:79) > > at > > > org.apache.solr.handler.component.SpellCheckComponent.getSpellChecker(SpellCheckComponent.java:603) > > at > > > org.apache.solr.handler.component.SpellCheckComponent.prepare(SpellCheckComponent.java:126) > > at ... > > > > The source mentions that the "initial use-case was to use > > WordBreakSolrSpellChecker in conjunction with the > DirectSolrSpellChecker". > > > > If I make a query with only of the dictionaries (file or direct), they > both > > work fine, combining them into one query throws the error. I'm not sure > if > > I'm doing something wrong or if I just can't use these two together > (yet). > > > > I'm using 6.2.0. Thanks for any help! > > > > Ryan >
