Erick Erickson wrote > It Depends. When running in Cloud mode then "yes". If you're running > stand-alone > then there is no Zookeeper running so the answer is "no".
Ah that helps, so no zookeeper in my case. I did wonder if it wasn't just sharing the same config files between master and slave from sharing the same configset. So it would appear I'm not replicating any of the managed files and reloading the slave core probably just reread the shared synonyms file. I'm also guessing those _schema and managed_schema files are an implementation detail for the missing zookeeper functionality. But if I did add those to a conffiles option it might automate the slave core reloads for me? > If a replication involved downloading of at least one configuration file, > the ReplicationHandler issues a core-reload command instead of a commit > command. (from https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Index+Replication) Currently I've no conffiles set on the slave and I know it didn't get reloaded after synonym changes to the master. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Replication-with-managed-resources-tp4289880p4290242.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
