Hello,
I hardly I understand why you need to find text:(Moby*) guys twice. Find
them once under {parent} is enough from my pov. Are you sure that just
using fl=[child] isn't enough, and why if so?
06 июля 2016 г. 13:48 пользователь "Sebastian Riemer" <s.rie...@littera.eu>
написал:
> Hi,
>
> Please consider the following three queries:
>
>
> (1) this works:
>
> {
> "responseHeader": {
> "status": 0,
> "QTime": 5,
> "params": {
> "q": "(type_s:wemi AND {!parent which='type_s:wemi'v='-type_s:wemi
> AND (((text:(Moby*))))'})",
> "facet.field": "m_mainAuthority_s",
> "indent": "true",
> "fq": "m_id_l:[* TO *]",
> "wt": "json",
> "facet": "true",
> "child.facet.field": [
> "corporateBodyContainer_name_t_ns_fac",
> "personContainer_name_t_ns_fac"
> ],
> "_": "1467801413472"
> }
> },
>
> (2) this also works:
>
> "responseHeader": {
>
> "status": 0,
>
> "QTime": 0,
>
> "params": {
>
> "q": "(((text:(Moby*))))(type_s:wemi AND {!parent
> which='type_s:wemi'v='-type_s:wemi AND (((text:(Moby*))))'})",
>
> "indent": "true",
>
> "fq": "m_id_l:[* TO *]",
>
> "wt": "json",
>
> "_": "1467801481986"
>
> }
>
> },
>
>
>
> (3) this does not:
>
> {
>
> "responseHeader": {
>
> "status": 400,
>
> "QTime": 3,
>
> "params": {
>
> "q": "(((text:(Moby*))))(type_s:wemi AND {!parent
> which='type_s:wemi'v='-type_s:wemi AND (((text:(Moby*))))'})",
>
> "facet.field": "m_mainAuthority_s",
>
> "indent": "true",
>
> "fq": "m_id_l:[* TO *]",
>
> "wt": "json",
>
> "facet": "true",
>
> "child.facet.field": [
>
> "corporateBodyContainer_name_t_ns_fac",
>
> "personContainer_name_t_ns_fac"
>
> ],
>
> "_": "1467801452826"
>
> }
>
> },
>
>
> (1) returns me parent documents where the child document contains the
> term "Moby*" including facets on a parent doc field AND facets on child doc
> fields (Nice!)
>
> (2) returns me parent documents where either the parent document or the
> child document contains the term "Moby*" (Hell yea!)
>
> (3) Fails with the error message "Block join faceting is allowed with
> ToParentBlockJoinQuery only" (Nay :()
>
> So, I want both, the possibility to search for a term in all fields of the
> parent and the child docs AND to receive the facet counts for fields of the
> parent AND the child. Is what I long for possible, and if so could you
> please punch me in the right direction?
>
> Many thanks,
> Sebastian
>
