It's been awhile since I installed it so I really can't say. I'm more of a code monkey than a server gal (particularly Linux... I'm amazed I got Solr installed in the first place, LOL!) So I had asked our network guy to look it over recently and see if it looked like I did it okay. He said since it shows up in the list of jars in the Solr admin that it's installed.... if that's not necessarily true, I probably need to point him in the right direction for what else to do since he really doesn't know Solr well either.
Mary Jo On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 7:49 PM, John Bickerstaff <j...@johnbickerstaff.com> wrote: > Thanks for the comment Mary Jo... > > The error loading the class rings a bell - did you find and follow > instructions for adding that to the WAR file? I vaguely remember seeing > something about that. > > I'm going to try my own tests on the auto phrasing one.. If I'm > successful, I'll post back. > > On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 3:45 PM, MaryJo Sminkey <mjsmin...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > This is a very timely discussion for me as well as we're trying to tackle > > the multi term synonym issue as well and have not been able to hon-lucene > > plugin to work, the jar shows up as installed but when we set up the > sample > > request handler it throws this error: > > > > > org.apache.solr.common.SolrException:org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: > > Error loading class > > > 'com.github.healthonnet.search.SynonymExpandingExtendedDismaxQParserPlugin' > > > > I have tried the auto-phrasing one as well (I did set up a field using > copy > > to configure it on) but when testing it didn't seem to return the > synonyms > > as expected. So gave up on that one too (am willing to give it another > try > > though, that was awhile ago). Would definitely like to hear what other > > people have found works on the latest versions of Solr 5.x and/or 6. Just > > sucks that this issue has never been fixed in the core product such that > > you still need to mess with plugins and patches to get such a basic > > functionality working properly. > > > > > > *Mary Jo Sminkey* > > *Senior ColdFusion Developer* > > > > *CF Webtools* > > You Dream It... We Build It. <https://www.cfwebtools.com/> > > 11204 Davenport Suite 100 > > Omaha, Nebraska 68154 > > O: 402.408.3733 x128 > > E: maryjo.smin...@cfwebtools.com > > Skype: maryjos.cfwebtools > > > > > > On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 5:02 PM, John Bickerstaff < > > j...@johnbickerstaff.com> > > wrote: > > > > > So I'm looking at the solution mentioned here: > > > > > > > > > https://lucidworks.com/blog/2014/07/12/solution-for-multi-term-synonyms-in-lucenesolr-using-the-auto-phrasing-tokenfilter/ > > > > > > The thing that's troubling me slightly is that the way it's documented > it > > > seems to be missing a small but important link... > > > > > > What exactly causes the results listed to be returned? > > > > > > Here's my thought process: > > > > > > 1. The entry for /autophrase searchHandler does not specify a default > > > search field. > > > 2. The field type "text_autophrase" is set up as the one with the > > > AutoPhrasingFilterFactory as part of it's indexing > > > > > > There isn't any mention (perhaps because it's too obvious) of the need > to > > > copy or otherwise get data into the "text_autophrase" field at index > > time. > > > > > > There isn't any explicit listing of "text_autophrase" as the default > > search > > > field in the /autophrase search handler > > > > > > There isn't any explicit statement of "df=text_autophrase" in the query > > > statment: [/autophrase?q=New+York] > > > > > > Therefore it seems to me that if someone tries to implement this, > they're > > > going to be disappointed in the results unless they: > > > a. copy or otherwise get ALL the text they're interested in -- into the > > > "text_autophrase" field as part of the schema.xml setup (to happen at > > index > > > time) > > > b. somehow explicitly declare "text_autophrase" as the default search > > field > > > - either in the searchHandler or wherever else the default field is > > > configured. > > > > > > If anyone out there has done this specific approach - could you > validate > > > whether my thought process is correct and / or if I'm missing > something? > > > Yes - I get that I can set it all up and try - but it's what I don't > > know I > > > don't know that bothers me... > > > > > > On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 11:57 AM, John Bickerstaff < > > > j...@johnbickerstaff.com > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Thank you Steve -- very helpful. > > > > > > > > I can see that whatever implementation I decide to try, some testing > > will > > > > be in order. If anyone is aware of significant gotchas with this > > synonym > > > > thing that are not mentioned in the already-listed URLs, please feel > > free > > > > to comment. > > > > > > > > On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 10:28 AM, Steve Rowe <sar...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > >> I’m working on addressing problems using multi-term synonyms at > query > > > >> time in Lucene and Solr. > > > >> > > > >> I recommend these two blogs for understanding the issues (the second > > one > > > >> was mentioned earlier in this thread): > > > >> > > > >> < > > > >> > > > > > > http://blog.mikemccandless.com/2012/04/lucenes-tokenstreams-are-actually.html > > > >> > > > > >> < > https://nolanlawson.com/2012/10/31/better-synonym-handling-in-solr/> > > > >> > > > >> In addition to the already-mentioned projects, there is also: > > > >> > > > >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5379> > > > >> > > > >> All of these projects try in various ways to work around the fact > that > > > >> Lucene’s QueryParser splits on whitespace before sending text to > > > analysis, > > > >> one token at a time, so in a synonym filter, multi-word synonyms can > > > never > > > >> match and add alternatives. See < > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2605>, where I’ve > > posted a > > > >> patch to directly address that problem - note that it’s still a work > > in > > > >> progress. > > > >> > > > >> Once LUCENE-2605 has been fixed, there is still work to do getting > > > >> (e)dismax to work with the modified Lucene QueryParser, and > addressing > > > >> problems with how queries are constructed from Lucene’s “sausagized” > > > token > > > >> stream. > > > >> > > > >> -- > > > >> Steve > > > >> www.lucidworks.com > > > >> > > > >> > On May 26, 2016, at 2:21 PM, John Bickerstaff < > > > j...@johnbickerstaff.com> > > > >> wrote: > > > >> > > > > >> > Thanks Chris -- > > > >> > > > > >> > The two projects I'm aware of are: > > > >> > > > > >> > https://github.com/healthonnet/hon-lucene-synonyms > > > >> > > > > >> > and the one referenced from the Lucidworks page here: > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > https://lucidworks.com/blog/2014/07/12/solution-for-multi-term-synonyms-in-lucenesolr-using-the-auto-phrasing-tokenfilter/ > > > >> > > > > >> > ... which is here : > > > >> https://github.com/LucidWorks/auto-phrase-tokenfilter > > > >> > > > > >> > Is there anything else out there that you would recommend I look > at? > > > >> > > > > >> > On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Chris Morley < > ch...@depahelix.com > > > > > > >> wrote: > > > >> > > > > >> >> Chris Morley here, from Wayfair. (Depahelix = my domain) > > > >> >> > > > >> >> Suyash Sonawane and I have worked on multiple word synonyms at > > > Wayfair. > > > >> >> We worked mostly off of Ted Sullivan's work and also off of some > > > >> >> suggestions from Koorosh Vakhshoori. We have gotten to a point > > where > > > >> we > > > >> >> have a more sophisticated internal implementation, however, we've > > > found > > > >> >> that it is very difficult to make it do what you want it to do, > and > > > >> also be > > > >> >> sufficiently performant. Watch out for exceptional situations > with > > > mm > > > >> >> (minimum should match). > > > >> >> > > > >> >> Trey Grainger (now at Lucidworks) and Simon Hughes of Dice.com > have > > > >> also > > > >> >> done work in this area. > > > >> >> > > > >> >> It should be very possible to get this kind of thing working on > > > >> >> SolrCloud. I haven't tried it yet but I think theoretically, it > > > should > > > >> >> just work. The synonyms stuff is mostly about doing things at > > index > > > >> time > > > >> >> and query time. The index time stuff should translate to > SolrCloud > > > >> >> directly, while the query time stuff might pose some issues, but > > > >> probably > > > >> >> not too bad, if there are any issues at all. > > > >> >> > > > >> >> I've had decent luck porting our various plugins from 4.10.x to > > 5.5.0 > > > >> >> because a lot of stuff is just Java, and it still works within > the > > > >> Jetty > > > >> >> context. > > > >> >> > > > >> >> -Chris. > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> ---------------------------------------- > > > >> >> From: "John Bickerstaff" <j...@johnbickerstaff.com> > > > >> >> Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 1:51 PM > > > >> >> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > > > >> >> Subject: Re: Solr Cloud and Multi-word Synonyms :: > synonym_edismax > > > >> parser > > > >> >> Hey Jeff (or anyone interested in multi-word synonyms) here are > > some > > > >> >> potentially interesting links... > > > >> >> > > > >> >> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/QueryParser (search the page for > > > >> >> synonum_edismax) > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > https://nolanlawson.com/2012/10/31/better-synonym-handling-in-solr/ > > > >> (blog > > > >> >> post about what became the synonym_edissmax Query Parser) > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> > > > > > > https://lucidworks.com/blog/2014/07/12/solution-for-multi-term-synonyms-in-lucenesolr-using-the-auto-phrasing-tokenfilter/ > > > >> >> > > > >> >> This last was useful for lots of reasons and contains links to > > other > > > >> >> interesting, related web pages... > > > >> >> > > > >> >> On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 11:45 AM, Jeff Wartes < > > > jwar...@whitepages.com> > > > >> >> wrote: > > > >> >> > > > >> >>> Oh, interesting. I've certainty encountered issues with > multi-word > > > >> >>> synonyms, but I hadn't come across this. If you end up using it > > > with a > > > >> >>> recent solr verison, I'd be glad to hear your experience. > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> I haven't used it, but I am aware of one other project in this > > vein > > > >> that > > > >> >>> you might be interested in looking at: > > > >> >>> https://github.com/LucidWorks/auto-phrase-tokenfilter > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> On 5/26/16, 9:29 AM, "John Bickerstaff" < > j...@johnbickerstaff.com > > > > > > >> >> wrote: > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>>> Ahh - for question #3 I may have spoken too soon. This line > from > > > the > > > >> >>>> github repository readme suggests a way. > > > >> >>>> > > > >> >>>> Update: We have tested to run with the jar in $SOLR_HOME/lib as > > > well, > > > >> >> and > > > >> >>>> it works (Jetty). > > > >> >>>> > > > >> >>>> I'll try that and only respond back if that doesn't work. > > > >> >>>> > > > >> >>>> Questions 1 and 2 still stand of course... If anyone on the > list > > > has > > > >> >>>> experience in this area... > > > >> >>>> > > > >> >>>> Thanks. > > > >> >>>> > > > >> >>>> On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 10:25 AM, John Bickerstaff < > > > >> >>> j...@johnbickerstaff.com > > > >> >>>>> wrote: > > > >> >>>> > > > >> >>>>> Hi all, > > > >> >>>>> > > > >> >>>>> I'm creating a Solr Cloud that will index and search medical > > text. > > > >> >>>>> Multi-word synonyms are a pretty important factor. > > > >> >>>>> > > > >> >>>>> I find that there are some challenges around multi-word > synonyms > > > >> and I > > > >> >>>>> also found on the wiki that there is a recommended 3rd-party > > > parser > > > >> >>>>> (synonym_edismax parser) created by Nolan Lawson and found > here: > > > >> >>>>> https://github.com/healthonnet/hon-lucene-synonyms > > > >> >>>>> > > > >> >>>>> Here's the thing - the instructions on the github site involve > > > >> >> bringing > > > >> >>>>> the jar file into the war file - which is not applicable any > > > more... > > > >> >> at > > > >> >>>>> least I think it's not... > > > >> >>>>> > > > >> >>>>> I have three questions: > > > >> >>>>> > > > >> >>>>> 1. Is this still a good solution for multi-word synonyms (I.e. > > > Solr > > > >> >>> Cloud > > > >> >>>>> doesn't break it in some way) > > > >> >>>>> 2. Is there a tool or plug-in out there that the contributors > > > would > > > >> >>>>> recommend above this one? > > > >> >>>>> 3. Assuming 1 = yes and 2 = no, can anyone tell me an updated > > > >> >> procedure > > > >> >>>>> for bringing it in to Solr Cloud (I'm running 5.4.x) > > > >> >>>>> > > > >> >>>>> Thanks > > > >> >>>>> > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
