Hi Erick,

Thank you for the reply. What I meant was suppose I have the config:

2 shards each with 1 replica.

Hence, on both servers I have
1.  shard1_replica1
2 . shard2_replica1

Suppose I have 50 documents then,
shard1_replica1 + shard2_replica1 = 50 ?

or shard2_replica1 = 50 && shard1_replica1 = 50 ?

Regards,

Sid.

On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 2:30 PM, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Q1: Not quite sure what you mean. Let's say I have 2 shards, 3
> replicas each 16 docs on each.I _think_ you're
> talking about the "core selector", which shows the docs on that
> particular core, 16 in our case not 48.
>
> Q2: Yes, that's how SolrCloud is designed. It has to be for HA/DR.
> Every replica in a shard has all the docs, 16 as above. Otherwise if
> one of your machines went down there could be no guarantee even
> attempted about there not being data loss.
>
> Q3: Yes, indexing will be slower when there is more than one replica
> per shard since the raw document is forwarded from the leader to all
> followers before acking back. In distributed situations, you will have
> a bunch (potentially) more machines doing indexing so total throughput
> can be faster.
>
> Why do you care? Is there a problem or is this just general background
> info? There are a number of techniques for speeding up indexing, the
> first is to use SolrJ and CloudSolrClient and send batches of docs at
> once rather than one-at-a-time.
>
> Best,
> Erick
>
> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Siddhartha Singh Sandhu
> <sandhus...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I recently moved to a SolrCloud config. I had a few questions:
> >
> > Q1. Does a shard show cumulative number of documents or documents present
> > in that particular shard on the admin console of respective shard?
> >
> > Q2. If 1's answer is non-cumulative then my shards(on different servers)
> > are indexing all the documents on each instance of shard. Is this
> natural?
> > I created the shards with compositeId.
> >
> > Q3. If the answer to 1 is cumulative then my indexing was slower then a
> > single core instance which was on the same machine of which I have 2
> >  now(my shards). What could I be missing while configuring Solr?
> >
> >
> > I am using Solr 6.0.0 on Ubuntu 14.04 with external zookeeper.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Sid.
>

Reply via email to