Don't really get what "Q= {!dismax qf=address} "rek Dr*" - It is not
allowed since perfix in Quotes is not allowed" means, why cant you use
exact phrase matching? Do you have some limitation of quoting as you are
specifically looking for an exact phrase I dont see why you wouldn't want
exact matching.Anyways You can look into using another type of tokenizer, my guess is you are probably using the standard tokenizer or possibly the whitespace tokenizer. You may want to try a different one a see what result you get. Also you probably wont need to use the wildcards if you setup you gram sizes the way you want. The shingle factory can do stuff like (now my memory is a bit fuzzy on this but I play with it in the admin page). This is a sentence shingle = 4 this_is_a_sentence Combine that with your ngram factory and you can do something like. Mingram = 4 max =50 this this_i this_is .... this_is_a_sentence his_i his_is .... his_is_a_sentence etc. Then apply the shingle factory on query to take something like his is-> his_is and you will get that phrase back. My personal favorite is just using edgengram and fixing something like but the concept is the same with regular old ngram: 2001 N Drive Derek Fullerton 2 [32] 0 1 1 word 1 20 [32 30] 0 2 1 word 1 200 [32 30 30] 0 3 1 word 1 2001 [32 30 30 31] 0 4 1 word 1 n [6e] 5 6 1 word 2 d [64] 7 8 1 word 3 dr [64 72] 7 9 1 word 3 dri [64 72 69] 7 10 1 word 3 driv [64 72 69 76] 7 11 1 word 3 drive [64 72 69 76 65] 7 12 1 word 3 d [64] 13 14 1 word 4 de [64 65] 13 15 1 word 4 der [64 65 72] 13 16 1 word 4 dere [64 65 72 65] 13 17 1 word 4 derek [64 65 72 65 6b] 13 18 1 word 4 f [66] 19 20 1 word 5 fu [66 75] 19 21 1 word 5 ful [66 75 6c] 19 22 1 word 5 full [66 75 6c 6c] 19 23 1 word 5 fulle [66 75 6c 6c 65] 19 24 1 word 5 fuller [66 75 6c 6c 65 72] 19 25 1 word 5 fullert [66 75 6c 6c 65 72 74] 19 26 1 word 5 fullerto [66 75 6c 6c 65 72 74 6f] 19 27 1 word 5 fullerton [66 75 6c 6c 65 72 74 6f 6e] 19 28 1 word 5 Works great for a quick type-ahead field type. Oh and by the way your ngram size is two small for _rek_ to be split up from _derek_ Setting up a few different field types and playing with the analyzer in admin page can give you a good idea about what both index and query time results can be and with your tiny data set is the best way I can think of to see instant results with your new field types. Nick On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 10:01 AM, Thrinadh Kuppili <[email protected]> wrote: > I have tried with <filter class="solr.NGramFilterFactory" minGramSize="4" > maxGramSize="12"/> and search using the Extended Dismax > > Q= {!dismax qf=address} rek Dr* - It did not work as expected since i am > getting all the records which has rek, Dr . > > Q= {!dismax qf=address} "rek Dr*" - It is not allowed since perfix in > Quotes > is not allowed. > > Q= {!complexphrase inOrder=true}address:"rek dr*" - It did not work since > it > is searching for words starts with rek > > I am not aware of shingle factory as of now will try to use and findout how > i can use. > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/How-to-search-in-solr-for-words-like-rek-Dr-tp4275854p4275859.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
