What about the field types though... are they single valued or multi
valued, string, text, numeric?

-Yonik


On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Nick Vasilyev
<nick.vasily...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Yonik,
>
> I forgot to mention that the index is approximately 50 million docs split
> across 4 shards (replication factor 2) on 2 solr replicas.
>
> This particular script will filter items based on a category (10-~1,000,000
> items in each) and run facets on top X terms for particular fields. Query
> looks like this:
>
> {
>    q => "cat:$code",
>    rows => 0,
>    facet => 'true',
>    'facet.field' => [ 'key_phrases', 'mmfr_exact' ],
>    'f.key_phrases.facet.limit' => 100,
>    'f.mmfr_exact.facet.limit' => 20,
>    'facet.mincount' => 5,
>    distrib => 'false',
>  }
>
> I know it can be re-worked some, especially considering there are thousands
> of similar requests going out. However we didn't have this issue before and
> I am worried that it may be a symptom of a larger underlying problem.
>
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 11:34 AM, Yonik Seeley <ysee...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 11:29 AM, Nick Vasilyev
>> <nick.vasily...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > We recently upgraded to Solr 5.2.1 with jre1.8.0_74 and are seeing long
>> GC
>> > pauses when running jobs that do some hairy faceting. The same jobs
>> worked
>> > fine with our previous 4.6 Solr.
>>
>> What does a typical request look like, and what are the field types
>> that faceting is done on?
>>
>> -Yonik
>>
>>
>> > The JVM is configured with 32GB heap with default GC settings, however
>> I've
>> > been tweaking the GC settings to no avail. The latest version had the
>> > following differences from the default config:
>> >
>> > XX:ConcGCThreads and XX:ParallelGCThreads are increased from 4 to 7
>> >
>> > XX:CMSInitiatingOccupancyFraction increased from 50 to 70
>> >
>> >
>> > Here is a sample output from the gc_log
>> >
>> > 2016-04-28T04:36:47.240-0400: 27905.535: Total time for which application
>> > threads were stopped: 0.1667520 seconds, Stopping threads took: 0.0171900
>> > seconds
>> > {Heap before GC invocations=2051 (full 59):
>> >  par new generation   total 6990528K, used 2626705K [0x00002b16c0000000,
>> > 0x00002b18c0000000, 0x00002b18c0000000)
>> >   eden space 5592448K,  44% used [0x00002b16c0000000, 0x00002b17571b9948,
>> > 0x00002b1815560000)
>> >   from space 1398080K,  10% used [0x00002b1815560000, 0x00002b181e8cac28,
>> > 0x00002b186aab0000)
>> >   to   space 1398080K,   0% used [0x00002b186aab0000, 0x00002b186aab0000,
>> > 0x00002b18c0000000)
>> >  concurrent mark-sweep generation total 25165824K, used 25122205K
>> > [0x00002b18c0000000, 0x00002b1ec0000000, 0x00002b1ec0000000)
>> >  Metaspace       used 41840K, capacity 42284K, committed 42680K, reserved
>> > 43008K
>> > 2016-04-28T04:36:49.828-0400: 27908.123: [GC (Allocation Failure)
>> > 2016-04-28T04:36:49.828-0400: 27908.124:
>> [CMS2016-04-28T04:36:49.912-0400:
>> > 27908.207: [CMS-concurr
>> > ent-abortable-preclean: 5.615/5.862 secs] [Times: user=17.70 sys=2.77,
>> > real=5.86 secs]
>> >  (concurrent mode failure): 25122205K->15103706K(25165824K), 8.5567560
>> > secs] 27748910K->15103706K(32156352K), [Metaspace:
>> 41840K->41840K(43008K)],
>> > 8.5657830 secs] [
>> > Times: user=8.56 sys=0.01, real=8.57 secs]
>> > Heap after GC invocations=2052 (full 60):
>> >  par new generation   total 6990528K, used 0K [0x00002b16c0000000,
>> > 0x00002b18c0000000, 0x00002b18c0000000)
>> >   eden space 5592448K,   0% used [0x00002b16c0000000, 0x00002b16c0000000,
>> > 0x00002b1815560000)
>> >   from space 1398080K,   0% used [0x00002b1815560000, 0x00002b1815560000,
>> > 0x00002b186aab0000)
>> >   to   space 1398080K,   0% used [0x00002b186aab0000, 0x00002b186aab0000,
>> > 0x00002b18c0000000)
>> >  concurrent mark-sweep generation total 25165824K, used 15103706K
>> > [0x00002b18c0000000, 0x00002b1ec0000000, 0x00002b1ec0000000)
>> >  Metaspace       used 41840K, capacity 42284K, committed 42680K, reserved
>> > 43008K
>> > }
>> > 2016-04-28T04:36:58.395-0400: 27916.690: Total time for which application
>> > threads were stopped: 8.5676090 seconds, Stopping threads took: 0.0003930
>> > seconds
>> >
>> > I read the instructions here, https://wiki.apache.org/solr/ShawnHeisey,
>> but
>> > they seem to be specific to Java 7. Are there any updated recommendations
>> > for Java 8?
>>

Reply via email to