Also you mentioned your field was a string? This means the field must match *exactly* to be considered.a phrase match. Have you considered changing the field to text field type with a tokenizer and doing phrase matching -- it might work more like you'd expect.
Thanks -Doug On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 7:59 PM Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> wrote: > bq: I cannot find either the condition on the field analyzer to be able to > use > pf, pf2 and pf3. > > These don't apply to field analysis at all. What they translate into > is a series of > phrase queries against different sets of fields. So, you may have > pf=fieldA^5 fieldB > pf2=fieldA^3 fieldC > > Now a query like (without quotes) "big dog" would be > translated into something like > ... > fieldA:"big dog"^5 fieldB:"big dog" fieldA:"big dog"^3 fieldC:"big dog" > > Having multiple pf fields allows you to query with different slop values, > different boosts etc. on the same or different fields. > > Best, > Erick > > > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Antoine LE FLOC'H <lefl...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I don't have Solr source code handy but is > > pf3=1& > > pf2=1& > > valid ? What would that do ? use the df or qf fields ? > > > > This > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/The+Extended+DisMax+Query+Parser > > says that the value of pf2 is a multivalued list of fields ? There are > not > > many example about this in this link. > > > > I cannot find either the condition on the field analyzer to be able to > use > > pf, pf2 and pf3. > > > > Feedback would be appreciated, thanks. > > > > Antoine. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 8:29 PM, Ramzi Alqrainy <ramzi.alqra...@gmail.com > > > > wrote: > > > >> I tried to produce your case in my machine with below queries, but > >> everything > >> worked fine with me. I just want to ask you a question what is the field > >> type of "tag" field ? > >> > >> q=bmw& > >> fl=score,*& > >> wt=json& > >> fq=city_id:59& > >> qt=/query& > >> defType=edismax& > >> pf=title^15%20discription^5& > >> pf3=1& > >> pf2=1& > >> ps=1& > >> qroup=true& > >> group.field=member_id& > >> group.limit=10& > >> sort=score desc& > >> group.ngroups=true > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> q=bmw& > >> fl=score,*& > >> wt=json& > >> fq=city_id:59& > >> qt=/query& > >> defType=edismax& > >> pf=title^15%20discription^5& > >> pf3=1& > >> pf2=1& > >> ps=1& > >> qroup=true& > >> group.field=member_id& > >> group.limit=10& > >> group.ngroups=true& > >> sort=score desc& > >> fq=category_id:1777 > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> View this message in context: > >> > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Cannot-use-Phrase-Queries-in-eDisMax-and-filtering-tp4167302p4167338.html > >> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >> >
