re: upgrading to 5.x... 5X Solr's are NOT guaranteed to read 3x indexes, you'd have to go through 4x to do that.
If you can re-index from scratch that would be best. Best, Erick On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 12:29 PM, Shawn Heisey <apa...@elyograg.org> wrote: > On 4/14/2016 11:17 AM, Sara Woodmansee wrote: >> I posted yesterday, however I never received my own post, so worried it did >> not go through (?) > > I *did* see your previous message, but couldn't immediately think of > anything constructive to say. I've had a little bit of time on my lunch > break today to look deeper. > > EnglishMinimalStemFilter is designed to *not* aggressively stem > everything it sees. It appears that the behavior you are seeing is > probably intentional with that filter. > > In 5.5.0 and 6.0.0, PorterStemFilter will handle words of the form you > mentioned correctly. In the screenshot below, PSF means > "PorterStemFilter". I did not check any earlier versions. I already > had these versions on my system. > > https://www.dropbox.com/s/ss48vinrtbgifce/stemmer-ee-es-6.0.0.png?dl=0 > > https://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters#Stemming > > That version of Solr is over four years old. Bugs in 3.x will *not* be > fixed. Bugs in 4.x will also not be fixed. On 5.x, only extremely > major bugs are likely to get any attention, and this does not qualify as > a major bug. > > ------------ > > On another matter: > > http://people.apache.org/~hossman/#threadhijack > > You replied to a message with the subject "Solr Support for BM25F" ... > so your message is showing up within that thread. > > https://www.dropbox.com/s/xi0o8z6smhd2n5d/woodmansee-thread-hijack.png?dl=0 > > Thanks, > Shawn >
