Thank you very much both of you for your insights! I really appreciate it.
2016-04-13 11:30 GMT-03:00 Kevin Risden <compuwizard...@gmail.com>: > For Solr 6, ParallelSQL and Solr JDBC driver are going to be developed more > as well as JSON facets. The Solr JDBC driver that is in Solr 6 contains > SOLR-8502. There are further improvements coming in SOLR-8659 that didn't > make it into 6.0. The Solr JDBC piece leverages ParallelSQL and in some > cases uses JSON facets under the hood. > > The Solr JDBC driver should enable BI tools to connect to Solr and use the > language of SQL. This is also a familiar interface for many Java > developers. > > Just a note: Solr is not an RDBMS and shouldn't be treated like one even > with a JDBC driver. The Solr JDBC driver is more of a convenience for > querying. > > Kevin Risden > > On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 6:24 PM, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > The unsatisfactory answer is that the have different characteristics. > > > > The analytics contrib does not work in distributed mode. It's not > > receiving a lot of love at this point. > > > > The JSON facets are estimations. Generally very close but are not > > guaranteed to be 100% accurate. The variance, as I understand it, > > is something on the order of < 1% in most cases. > > > > The pivot facets are accurate, but more expensive than the JSON > > facets. > > > > And, to make matters worse, the ParllelSQL way of doing some > > aggregations is going to give yet another approach. > > > > Best, > > Erick > > > > On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 7:15 AM, Pablo <anzorena.f...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hello, > > > I think this topic is important for solr users that are planning to use > > solr > > > as a BI Tool. > > > Speaking about facets, nowadays there are three majors way of doing > > (more or > > > less) the same in solr. > > > First, you have the pivot facets, on the other hand you have the > > Analytics > > > component and finally you have the JSON Facet Api. > > > So, which line is Solr following? Which of these component is going to > > be in > > > constant development and which one is going to be deprecated sooner. > > > In Yonik page, there are some test that shows how JSON Facet Api > performs > > > better than legacy facets, also the Api was way simpler than the pivot > > > facets, so in my case that was enough to base my solution around the > JSON > > > Api. But I would like to know what are the thoughts of the solr > > developers. > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > View this message in context: > > > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Which-line-is-solr-following-in-terms-of-a-BI-Tool-tp4269597.html > > > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > >
