Here's a _very_ useful explanation of why the query syntax isn't pure Boolean: https://lucidworks.com/blog/2011/12/28/why-not-and-or-and-not/
Best, Erick On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 12:30 AM, Anil <anilk...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thank you Dikshant. > > On 10 March 2016 at 13:26, Dikshant Shahi <contacts...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> No, + and "and" doesn't works similar. Even "and" and "AND" would have a >> different behavior (is configurable) in edismax. >> >> When you put a + before a term, you specify that it's mandatory. Hence, >> "+google +india" will get you the same result as "google AND india". >> >> Best Regards, >> *Dikshant Shahi* >> >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 12:59 PM, Anil <anilk...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > "google"+"india" , "india"+"google" returning different results. Any >> help >> > would be appreciated. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Anil >> > >> > >> > On 10 March 2016 at 11:47, Anil <anilk...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > > HI, >> > > >> > > I am using edismax query parser for my solr search. >> > > >> > > i believe '+' and 'and' should work similar. >> > > >> > > ex : "google"+"india", "google" and "india" should return same number >> of >> > > results. >> > > >> > > Correct me if I am wrong. Thanks. >> > > >> > > Regards, >> > > Anil >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >>
