On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 10:19 AM, plbarrios <plbarr...@msn.com> wrote: > Joel, > > Thank you for the reply! > > This approach solved my problem. > > Now should I be concerned about the 32 bits that are lost in converting the > long to an int? Also, is this the intended approach when using > NumericDocValues?
If the value was was originally a float, then no bits are lost, there were only 32 to begin with. -Yonik