Jack Krupansky <jack.krupan...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Again to be clear, if you really do need the best/minimal overall query
> latency, your best bet is to have sufficient system memory to fully cache
> the entire index. If you actually don't need minimal latency, then of
> course you can feel free to trade off RAM for lower latency.

This bears repeating and I wish it would be added each time someone presents 
the "free cache = index size" rule of thumb. Thank you for stating it so 
clearly, Jack.

- Toke Eskildsen

Reply via email to