Hi Bruno,  I just tested on 5.4 for your sake and it works fine.  You are
somewhere goofing up.  Please create a new simple schema different from
your use case with 2-3 fields with 2-3 documents and test this out
independently on your current problem.  That's what i can make suggestion
and did same to confirm this.

On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Bruno Mannina <bmann...@free.fr> wrote:

> Same result on my dev' server, it seems that collection param haven't
> effect on the query...
>
> Q: I don't see on the solr 5.4 doc, the "collection" param for select
> handler, is it always present in 5.4 version ?
>
>
> Le 06/01/2016 17:38, Bruno Mannina a écrit :
>
>> I have a dev' server, I will do some test on it...
>>
>> Le 06/01/2016 17:31, Susheel Kumar a écrit :
>>
>>> I'll suggest if you can setup some some test data locally and try this
>>> out.  This will confirm your understanding.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Susheel
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Bruno Mannina <bmann...@free.fr> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Susheel, Emir,
>>>>
>>>> yes I check, and I have one result in c1 and in c2 with the same query
>>>> fid:34520196
>>>>
>>>> http://xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:xxxx
>>>> /solr/c1/select?q=fid:34520196&wt=json&indent=true&fl=id,fid,cc*,st&collection=c1,c2
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> { "responseHeader":{ "status":0, "QTime":1, "params":{
>>>> "fl":"fid,cc*,st",
>>>> "indent":"true", "q":"fid:34520196", "collection":"c1,c2",
>>>> "wt":"json"}},
>>>> "response":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"docs":[ {
>>>>
>>>>          "id":"EP1680447",
>>>>          "st":"LAPSED",
>>>>          "fid":"34520196"}]
>>>>    }
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:xxxx
>>>> /solr/c2/select?q=fid:34520196&wt=json&indent=true&fl=id,fid,cc*,st&collection=c1,c2
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> {
>>>>    "responseHeader":{
>>>>      "status":0,
>>>>      "QTime":0,
>>>>      "params":{
>>>>        "fl":"id,fid,cc*,st",
>>>>        "indent":"true",
>>>>        "q":"fid:34520196",
>>>>        "collection":"c1,c2",
>>>>        "wt":"json"}},
>>>>    "response":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"docs":[
>>>>        {
>>>>          "id":"WO2005040212",
>>>>          "st":"PENDING",
>>>>          "cc_CA":"LAPSED",
>>>>          "cc_EP":"LAPSED",
>>>>          "cc_JP":"PENDING",
>>>>          "cc_US":"LAPSED",
>>>>          "fid":"34520196"}]
>>>>    }}
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I have the same xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:xxxx (server:port).
>>>> unique key field C1, C2 : id
>>>>
>>>> id data in C1 is different of id data in C2
>>>>
>>>> Must I config/set something in solr ?
>>>>
>>>> thanks,
>>>> Bruno
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Le 06/01/2016 14:56, Emir Arnautovic a écrit :
>>>>
>>>> Hi Bruno,
>>>>> Can you check counts? Is it possible that first page is only with
>>>>> results
>>>>> from collection that you sent request to so you assumed it returns only
>>>>> results from single collection?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Emir
>>>>>
>>>>> On 06.01.2016 14:33, Susheel Kumar wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Bruno,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I just tested this scenario in my local solr 5.3.1 and it returned
>>>>>> results
>>>>>> from two identical collections. I doubt if it is broken in 5.4 just
>>>>>> double
>>>>>> check if you are not missing anything else.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Susheel
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://localhost:8983/solr/c1/select?q=id_type%3Ahello&wt=json&indent=true&collection=c1,c2
>>>>>>
>>>>>> responseHeader": {"status": 0,"QTime": 98,"params": {"q":
>>>>>> "id_type:hello","
>>>>>> indent": "true","collection": "c1,c2","wt": "json"}},
>>>>>> response": {"numFound": 2,"start": 0,"maxScore": 1,"docs": [{"id":
>>>>>> "1","
>>>>>> id_type": "hello","_version_": 1522623395043213300},{"id":
>>>>>> "3","id_type":"
>>>>>> hello","_version_": 1522623422397415400}]}
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 6:13 AM, Bruno Mannina <bmann...@free.fr>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> yes id value is unique in C1 and unique in C2.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> id in C1 is never present in C2
>>>>>>> id in C2 is never present in C1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Le 06/01/2016 11:12, Binoy Dalal a écrit :
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Are Id values for docs in both the collections exactly same?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> To get proper results, the ids should be unique across both the
>>>>>>>> cores.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wed, 6 Jan 2016, 15:11 Bruno Mannina <bmann...@free.fr> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Solr 5.4, Ubuntu
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I thought it was simple to request across two collections with the
>>>>>>>>> same
>>>>>>>>> schema but not.
>>>>>>>>> I have one solr instance launch. 300 000 records in each
>>>>>>>>> collection.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I try to use this request without having both results:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> http://my_adress:my_port
>>>>>>>>> /solr/C1/select?collection=C1,C2&q=fid:34520196&wt=json
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> this request returns only C1 results and if I do:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> http://my_adress:my_port
>>>>>>>>> /solr/C2/select?collection=C1,C2&q=fid:34520196&wt=json
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> it returns only C2 results.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I have 5 identical fields on both collection
>>>>>>>>> id, fid, st, cc, timestamp
>>>>>>>>> where id is the unique key field.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Can someone could explain me why it doesn't work ?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks a lot !
>>>>>>>>> Bruno
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>> L'absence de virus dans ce courrier électronique a été vérifiée
>>>>>>>>> par le
>>>>>>>>> logiciel antivirus Avast.
>>>>>>>>> http://www.avast.com
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Binoy Dalal
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> L'absence de virus dans ce courrier électronique a été vérifiée par
>>>>>>> le
>>>>>>> logiciel antivirus Avast.
>>>>>>> http://www.avast.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>> L'absence de virus dans ce courrier électronique a été vérifiée par le
>>>> logiciel antivirus Avast.
>>>> http://www.avast.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>> ---
>> L'absence de virus dans ce courrier électronique a été vérifiée par le
>> logiciel antivirus Avast.
>> http://www.avast.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> ---
> L'absence de virus dans ce courrier électronique a été vérifiée par le
> logiciel antivirus Avast.
> http://www.avast.com
>
>

Reply via email to