Hi,
Who knows when it will be available in the nightly builds ?
Thanks,
William.
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 6:36 PM, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> : But we still prefer the usage of DIH package classes without any prefix.
> : type="HttpDataSource"
> : instead of
> : type="solr.HttpDataSource"
> :
> : But users must be able to load their classes using the "solr.<classname>"
> format
>
> I'm not 100% certain what you mean by that last comment, but it seems like
> the the most straight forward appraoch that will confuse the least amount
> of people is for DIH to be consistent with the rest of Solr in how
> "plugins" are loaded. The helper methods already exist to make this
> easy in SolrResourceLoader...
>
> public Class findClass(String cname, String... subpackages)
> public Object newInstance(String cname, String ... subpackages)
>
> ...all DIH needs to do is pass the appropriate subpackage(s?) ...
> "handler.dataimport." (and maybe in some cases lists like
> {"handler.dataimport.", "handler.dataimport.transformer."} if that's the
> way the code winds up being organized)
>
>
>
> -Hoss
>
>
