The expense is in gathering the pieces to do the indexing. There isn't much that I can do in that regard unfortunately. I need to investigate storing the fields, if they aren't returned is the expense just size on disk or is there a memory cost as well? On Dec 16, 2015 7:43 PM, "Alexandre Rafalovitch" <arafa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> ExternalFileField might be useful in some situations. > > But also, is it possible that your Solr schema configuration is not > best suited for your domain? Is it - for example - possible that the > additional data should be in child records? > > Pure guesswork here, not enough information. But, as described, Solr > will not be able to fulfill your needs easily. Something will need to > change. > > Regards, > Alex. > > ---- > Newsletter and resources for Solr beginners and intermediates: > http://www.solr-start.com/ > > > On 16 December 2015 at 22:09, Jamie Johnson <jej2...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I have a use case where we only need to append some fields to a document. > > To retrieve the full representation is very expensive but I can easily > get > > the deltas. Is it possible to just add fields to an existing Solr > > document? I experimented with using overwrite=false, but that resulted > in > > two documents with the same uniqueKey in the index (which makes sense). > Is > > there a way to accomplish what I'm looking to do in Solr? My fields > aren't > > all stored and think it will be too expensive for me to make that change. > > Any thoughts would be really appreciated. >
