Another question popped up around this: Is the facet.threads parameter still relevant with Json facets? I saw that the facet prefix bug https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6686 got fixed in 5.3 so I'm looking into re-enabling this parameter for our searches.
On a side note, I've been testing Json facet performance and I've observed that they're generally faster unless facet prefix filtering comes into play, then they seem to be slower than standard facets. Is that just a fluke or should I switch to Json Query Facets instead of using facet prefix filtering? Thanks again, Max -----Original Message----- From: Aigner, Max [mailto:max.aig...@nordstrom.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 11:54 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: RE: JSON facets and excluded queries Yes, just tried that and it works fine. That just removed a showstopper for me as my queries contain lots of tagged FQs and multi-select facets (implemented the 'good way' :). Thank you for the quick help! -----Original Message----- From: Yonik Seeley [mailto:ysee...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 11:38 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: JSON facets and excluded queries On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Yonik Seeley <ysee...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 2:15 PM, Aigner, Max <max.aig...@nordstrom.com> wrote: >> Thanks, this is great :=)) >> >> I hadn't seen the domain:{excludeTags:...} syntax yet and it doesn't seem to >> be working on 5.3.1 so I'm assuming this is work slated for 5.4 or 6. Did I >> get that right? > > Hmmm, the "domain" keyword was added for 5.3 along with block join > faceting: http://yonik.com/solr-nested-objects/ > That's when I switched "excludeTags" to also be under the "domain" keyword. > > Let me try it out... Ah, I messed up that migration... OK, for now, instead of domain:{excludeTags:foo} just use excludeTags:foo and it should work. -Yonik
