Hi Emir, Thanks for the clarification. If that improve the search performance then it is worthwhile to have the bigger index size. Since for any search engine, it is the search returning speed and accuracy that determines if the search engine is a good one.
Regards, Edwin On 7 December 2015 at 23:40, Emir Arnautovic <emir.arnauto...@sematext.com> wrote: > Hi Edwin, > It is expected since you are storing more info about document. > > Thanks, > Emir > > p.s. one correction - I meant offsets, not frequencies. > > > On 07.12.2015 15:47, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo wrote: > >> Hi Emir, >> >> The term vector, positions and frequencies wasn't enabled, so I'm doing >> the >> re-indexing. That is where I found that the index size is bigger than >> previously when I was using the Original Highlighter. >> >> Regards, >> Edwin >> >> >> On 7 December 2015 at 19:19, Emir Arnautovic < >> emir.arnauto...@sematext.com> >> wrote: >> >> Hi Edwin, >>> FastVector Highlighter requires term vector, positions and frequencies, >>> so >>> if it is not enabled on fields that you want to highlight, it will >>> increase >>> index size. Since it is common to have those enabled for standard >>> highlighter to speed up highlighting, those might already be enabled, >>> otherwise reindexing is required as well. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Emir >>> >>> >>> On 07.12.2015 12:06, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Would like to check, will using the FastVector Highlighter takes up more >>>> indexing space (the index size) as compared to the Original Highlighter? >>>> >>>> I'm using Solr 5.3.0 >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Edwin >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>> Monitoring * Alerting * Anomaly Detection * Centralized Log Management >>> Solr & Elasticsearch Support * http://sematext.com/ >>> >>> >>> > -- > Monitoring * Alerting * Anomaly Detection * Centralized Log Management > Solr & Elasticsearch Support * http://sematext.com/ > >
