On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 09:43:58 -0400
Daniel Papasian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Norberto Meijome wrote:
> > Thanks Yonik. ok, that matches what I've seen - if i know the actual
> > name of the field I'm after, I can use it in a query it, but i can't
> > use the dynamic_field_name_* (with wildcard) in the config.
> >
> > Is adding support for this something that is desirable / needed
> > (doable??) , and is it being worked on ?
>
> You can use a wildcard with copyFrom to copy the dynamic fields that
> match the pattern to another field that you can then query on. It seems
> like that would cover your needs, no?
indeed, that's what I did for this prototype. I was just wondering whether I
was missing something that would prevent it from working with dynfields.
cheers,
B
_________________________
{Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
Law of Conservation of Perversity:
we can't make something simpler without making something else more complex
I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet.
Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been
Warned.
