Thanks that's what I suspected given what I'm seeing but wanted to make sure. Again thanks On Nov 5, 2015 1:08 PM, "Mikhail Khludnev" <mkhlud...@griddynamics.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 10:41 PM, Jamie Johnson <jej2...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Is this expected to work? > > > I think it is. I'm still not sure I understand the question. But let me > bring some details from SOLR-3076: > - Solr's <uniqueKey> backs on Lucene's "deleteTerm" which is supplied into > indexWriter.updateDocument(); > - when parent document has children, <uniqueKey> is not a deleteTerm but > its' value is used for "deleteTerm" for field "_root_" see > > https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/blob/trunk/solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/update/DirectUpdateHandler2.java#L251 > - thus for block updates uniqueKey is (almost) meaningless. > It lacks of elegance, but that's it. > > -- > Sincerely yours > Mikhail Khludnev > Principal Engineer, > Grid Dynamics > > <http://www.griddynamics.com> > <mkhlud...@griddynamics.com> >
