Funny I'm editing a chapter about boosting for a book :) http://manning.com/turnbull
Anyway, I've been told by others that this blog post I wrote was really useful in teaching them how to carefully boost documents. Maybe it would help you? http://opensourceconnections.com/blog/2013/07/21/improve-search-relevancy-by-telling-solr-exactly-what-you-want/ This post by John Berryman is also a nice companion http://opensourceconnections.com/blog/2013/11/22/parameterizing-and-organizing-solr-boosts/ -Doug On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 9:12 AM, Paul Libbrecht <p...@hoplahup.net> wrote: > Alessandro, > > none of them seem to match what I'd expect be done: given an extra param > that indicates the author, for each query, add an extra boosting. > > Christian, > I used to do that with a query component (in java) but I think that > nowadays you can do that with the bq parameter of edismax. > > paul > > > > > Alessandro Benedetti <mailto:abenede...@apache.org> > > 5 novembre 2015 12:33 > > Hi Christian, > > there are several ways : > > > > 1) Elevation query component - it should be your winner : > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/The+Query+Elevation+Component > > > > 2) Play with boosting according to your requirements > > > > Cheers > > > > > > > > liviuchrist...@yahoo.com.INVALID <mailto: > liviuchrist...@yahoo.com.INVALID> > > 5 novembre 2015 11:52 > > Hi everyone,I'm building a food recipe search engine based on solr. > > > > I need to boost documents score for the recipes that their authors > > paid for in order to have them returned first when somebody searches > > for "chocolate cake with hazelnuts". So those recipes that match the > > query terms and their authors paid to be listed first need to be > > returned first, ahead of the unpaid ones that match the query. > > > > How do I do that in Solr? > > PLEASE HELP! > > Regards, > > Christian > > > > > > -- *Doug Turnbull **| *Search Relevance Consultant | OpenSource Connections <http://opensourceconnections.com>, LLC | 240.476.9983 Author: Relevant Search <http://manning.com/turnbull> This e-mail and all contents, including attachments, is considered to be Company Confidential unless explicitly stated otherwise, regardless of whether attachments are marked as such.