sorry,missed example input data:
child document:
{ "c_gender": "female", "c_window": "seaview", "_root_": 1673891436 }
parent document:
{ "_id": 1673891436, "county_code": "26021", "city": "Auburn", "year": 2012,
"county": "Berrien", "Sales": 112808, "state": "Washington", "product_group":
"Books", "sku": "ZD111588", "income_bracket": "$25000 to $50000", "_version_":
1513636454494896000, "_root_": 1673891436 },
2015-10-08 15:00 GMT+03:00 Iana Bondarska <yana2...@gmail.com>:
> Hello Mikhail,
>
> here are json.facet parameters that I tried:
> c_gender, c_window belong to child documents, rest - to parent.
>
> 1. returns no results, can we combine filters from different levels in
> queries
>
> { high_popularity : {
> type : query,
> q : "{!child of=city:Auburn}city:Auburn AND c_window:seaview",
> facet :{top_genres:{type: terms,field: c_gender}}
> }
> }
>
> 2.triggers full text search, I get error "undefined field:
> \"Review_Text\"" , that's true, I have mistake in configuration,but I
> didn't request fulltext search in the query
>
> { high_popularity : {
> type : query,
> q : "{!child of=city:Auburn}city:Auburn AND {child
> of=state:Washingthon}state:Washingthon",
> facet :{top_genres:{type: terms,field: c_gender}}
> }
> }
> logs for 2nd case:
>
> org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: undefined field: "Review_Text"
> at org.apache.solr.schema.IndexSchema.getField(IndexSchema.java:1229)
> at
> org.apache.solr.parser.SolrQueryParserBase.getRangeQuery(SolrQueryParserBase.java:769)
> at org.apache.solr.parser.QueryParser.Term(QueryParser.java:382)
> at org.apache.solr.parser.QueryParser.Clause(QueryParser.java:185)
> at org.apache.solr.parser.QueryParser.Query(QueryParser.java:139)
> at org.apache.solr.parser.QueryParser.TopLevelQuery(QueryParser.java:96)
> at
> org.apache.solr.parser.SolrQueryParserBase.parse(SolrQueryParserBase.java:151)
> at org.apache.solr.search.LuceneQParser.parse(LuceneQParser.java:50)
> at org.apache.solr.search.QParser.getQuery(QParser.java:141)
> at
> org.apache.solr.search.join.BlockJoinParentQParser.parse(BlockJoinParentQParser.java:70)
> at
> org.apache.solr.search.join.BlockJoinChildQParser.parse(BlockJoinChildQParser.java:25)
> at org.apache.solr.search.QParser.getQuery(QParser.java:141)
> at
> org.apache.solr.search.facet.FacetQueryParser.parse(FacetRequest.java:473)
> at
> org.apache.solr.search.facet.FacetParser.parseQueryFacet(FacetRequest.java:255)
> at
> org.apache.solr.search.facet.FacetParser.parseFacetOrStat(FacetRequest.java:238)
> at
> org.apache.solr.search.facet.FacetParser.parseFacetOrStat(FacetRequest.java:229)
> at
> org.apache.solr.search.facet.FacetParser.parseSubs(FacetRequest.java:179)
> at
> org.apache.solr.search.facet.FacetTopParser.parse(FacetRequest.java:427)
> at
> org.apache.solr.search.facet.FacetTopParser.parse(FacetRequest.java:416)
> at
> org.apache.solr.search.facet.FacetModule.prepare(FacetModule.java:125)
> at
> org.apache.solr.handler.component.SearchHandler.handleRequestBody(SearchHandler.java:251)
> at
> org.apache.solr.handler.RequestHandlerBase.handleRequest(RequestHandlerBase.java:143)
> at org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore.execute(SolrCore.java:2068)
> at org.apache.solr.servlet.HttpSolrCall.execute(HttpSolrCall.java:669)
> at org.apache.solr.servlet.HttpSolrCall.call(HttpSolrCall.java:462)
> at
> org.apache.solr.servlet.SolrDispatchFilter.doFilter(SolrDispatchFilter.java:210)
> at
> org.apache.solr.servlet.SolrDispatchFilter.doFilter(SolrDispatchFilter.java:179)
> at
> org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler$CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1652)
> at
> org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.doHandle(ServletHandler.java:585)
> at
> org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ScopedHandler.handle(ScopedHandler.java:143)
> at
> org.eclipse.jetty.security.SecurityHandler.handle(SecurityHandler.java:577)
> at
> org.eclipse.jetty.server.session.SessionHandler.doHandle(SessionHandler.java:223)
> at
> org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandler.doHandle(ContextHandler.java:1127)
> at
> org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.doScope(ServletHandler.java:515)
> at
> org.eclipse.jetty.server.session.SessionHandler.doScope(SessionHandler.java:185)
> at
> org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandler.doScope(ContextHandler.java:1061)
> at
> org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ScopedHandler.handle(ScopedHandler.java:141)
> at
> org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandlerCollection.handle(ContextHandlerCollection.java:215)
> at
> org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.HandlerCollection.handle(HandlerCollection.java:110)
> at
> org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.HandlerWrapper.handle(HandlerWrapper.java:97)
> at org.eclipse.jetty.server.Server.handle(Server.java:499)
> at org.eclipse.jetty.server.HttpChannel.handle(HttpChannel.java:310)
> at
> org.eclipse.jetty.server.HttpConnection.onFillable(HttpConnection.java:257)
> at
> org.eclipse.jetty.io.AbstractConnection$2.run(AbstractConnection.java:540)
> at
> org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.QueuedThreadPool.runJob(QueuedThreadPool.java:635)
> at
> org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.QueuedThreadPool$3.run(QueuedThreadPool.java:555)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
>
>
> 2015-10-08 12:42 GMT+03:00 Mikhail Khludnev <mkhlud...@griddynamics.com>:
>
>> Hello, Yana!
>>
>> It's not clear what happens. I appreciate if you put exact queries (up to
>> obfuscated values) and exceptions or actual results (and expectations);
>> sample data is also useful.
>> What I can note so far, user filters can't be used as parent mask in
>> _which_ and _of_. See
>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Other+Parsers#OtherParsers-BlockJoinQueryParsers
>> q={!parent which=<allParents>}<someChildren>. Again the parameter The
>> parameter allParents is a filter that matches only parent documents;
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 11:46 AM, Iana Bondarska <yana2...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hello,
>> > I'm trying to use block join feature with json api. I got following
>> error
>> > when add query with "which parent" or "child of " prefixes to query
>> facet.
>> > My query is :
>> >
>> > {!parent which="state:Idaho"} AND category:Books
>> >
>> > If I remove block-join prefixes -- query runs without errors. Are such
>> > filters supported by json api now?
>> >
>> > Best Regards,
>> > Iana
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sincerely yours
>> Mikhail Khludnev
>> Principal Engineer,
>> Grid Dynamics
>>
>> <http://www.griddynamics.com>
>> <mkhlud...@griddynamics.com>
>>
>
>
