Hmm. It seems I misread " the second processor needs to be executed after complete the first one." In fact, I am still unsure what that is supposed to mean.
Could you give a more concrete example of the sequence with say 2 items of each time and what you see vs. what you expect to see. And I assume for DIH, you have two top level entity definitions next to each other. Not nested entities, no update clauses (just full import), etc. Regards, Alex. ---- Solr Analyzers, Tokenizers, Filters, URPs and even a newsletter: http://www.solr-start.com/ On 30 September 2015 at 10:53, Roxana Danger <roxana.dan...@reedonline.co.uk> wrote: > Do you mean creating 2 instances and then generating a third one (or > updating one of them) for merging their data? > Is it not guaranteed that the entities in the DIH are imported in the order > described in the db-config file? > Thank you very much, > Roxana > > > > On 30 September 2015 at 14:48, Alexandre Rafalovitch <arafa...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Have you tried just having two separate endpoints each with its own >> definition of DIH and URP? Then, you just hit those end-points one at >> a time in whatever order you need. >> >> Seems easier than a custom switching logic. >> >> Regards, >> Alex. >> ---- >> Solr Analyzers, Tokenizers, Filters, URPs and even a newsletter: >> http://www.solr-start.com/ >> >> >> On 28 September 2015 at 11:23, Roxana Danger >> <roxana.dan...@reedonline.co.uk> wrote: >> > Hello, >> > I am importing in solr 2 entities coming from 2 different tables, >> and >> > I have defined an update request processor chain with two custom >> processor >> > factories: >> > - the first processor factory needs to be executed first for one >> type >> > of entities and then for the other (I differentiate the "entity type" >> with >> > a field called table). In the import data config file I keep the order on >> > which the entities should need to be processed. >> > - the second processor needs to be executed after complete the >> first >> > one. >> > When executed the updates having only the first processor, the >> updates >> > work all fine. However, when I added the second processor, it seems that >> > the first update processor is not getting the entities in the order I was >> > expected. >> > Does anyone had this problem before? Could anyone help me to >> configure >> > this? >> > Thank you very much in advance, >> > Roxana >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > <http://www.reed.co.uk/lovemondays> >> > > > > -- > Roxana Danger | Data Scientist Dragon Court, 27-29 Macklin Street, London, > WC2B 5LX Tel: 020 7067 4568 [image: reed.co.uk] <http://www.reed.co.uk/> The > UK's #1 job site. <http://www.reed.co.uk/> [image: Follow us on Twitter] > <https://twitter.com/reedcouk> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/reed.co.uk> [image: > Like us on Facebook] <https://www.facebook.com/reedcouk/> > <https://plus.google.com/u/0/+reedcouk/posts> It's time to Love Mondays ยป > <http://www.reed.co.uk/lovemondays>
