No problem Walter, it's all fun. Was just wondering if there was some other good way that I did not know of, that's all 😀
Thanks Ravi Kiran Bhaskar On Friday, September 25, 2015, Walter Underwood <wun...@wunderwood.org> wrote: > Sorry, I did not mean to be rude. The original question did not say that > you don’t have the docs outside of Solr. Some people jump to the advanced > features and miss the simple ones. > > It might be faster to fetch all the docs from Solr and save them in files. > Then modify them. Then reload all of them. No guarantee, but it is worth a > try. > > Good luck. > > wunder > Walter Underwood > wun...@wunderwood.org <javascript:;> > http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog) > > > > On Sep 25, 2015, at 2:59 PM, Ravi Solr <ravis...@gmail.com > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > > Walter, Not in a mood for banter right now.... Its 6:00pm on a friday and > > Iam stuck here trying to figure reindexing issues :-) > > I dont have source of docs so I have to query the SOLR, modify and put it > > back and that is seeming to be quite a task in 5.3.0, I did reindex > several > > times with 4.7.2 in a master slave env without any issue. Since then we > > have moved to cloud and it has been a pain all day. > > > > Thanks > > > > Ravi Kiran Bhaskar > > > > On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 5:25 PM, Walter Underwood <wun...@wunderwood.org > <javascript:;>> > > wrote: > > > >> Sure. > >> > >> 1. Delete all the docs (no commit). > >> 2. Add all the docs (no commit). > >> 3. Commit. > >> > >> wunder > >> Walter Underwood > >> wun...@wunderwood.org <javascript:;> > >> http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog) > >> > >> > >>> On Sep 25, 2015, at 2:17 PM, Ravi Solr <ravis...@gmail.com > <javascript:;>> wrote: > >>> > >>> I have been trying to re-index the docs (about 1.5 million) as one of > the > >>> field needed part of string value removed (accidentally introduced). I > >> was > >>> issuing a query for 100 docs getting 4 fields and updating the doc > >> (atomic > >>> update with "set") via the CloudSolrClient in batches, However from > time > >> to > >>> time the query returns 0 results, which exits the re-indexing program. > >>> > >>> I cant understand as to why the cloud returns 0 results when there are > >> 1.4x > >>> million docs which have the "accidental" string in them. > >>> > >>> Is there another way to do bulk massive updates ? > >>> > >>> Thanks > >>> > >>> Ravi Kiran Bhaskar > >> > >> > >
