Uwe
Unfortunately fieldValueCache was dropped there
https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/commit/fca4c22da81447867533fb28c0f06150cdc2eb9d#diff-5ac9dc7b128b4dd99b764060759222b2R428
However, I see that it's still available in new JSON facets (thus, you need
to amend your app).
Otherwise, you can postpone migration till 5.4. or apply and measure DV
facet fix from SOLR-7730 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7730>.

On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 12:38 PM, Uwe Reh <r...@hebis.uni-frankfurt.de>
wrote:

> Am 22.09.2015 um 18:10 schrieb Walter Underwood:
>
>> Faceting on an author field is almost always a bad idea. Or at least a
>> slow, expensive idea.
>>
>
> Hi Wunder,
> n a technical context, the 'author'-facet may be suboptimal. In our
> businesses (library services) it's a core feature.
> Yes the facet is expensive, but thanks to the fieldValueCache (4.10)
> sufficiently fast.
>
> uwe
>
>


-- 
Sincerely yours
Mikhail Khludnev
Principal Engineer,
Grid Dynamics

<http://www.griddynamics.com>
<mkhlud...@griddynamics.com>

Reply via email to