tnx.
as i see more like this.i underestand that if  i set field
"termVectors=true"
and i set this in solrconfig:

<requestHandler name="/mlt" class="solr.MoreLikeThisHandler">
</requestHandler>

now i use pysolr and i add this docs:


{
    'id': 'doc_11',
    'title': 'these trees are amazing',
    'tags':['fruit','peach','apple']
}

now i want to find like more this doc that tags=fruit

so i write this:
similar = solr.more_like_this(q='tags:fruit',mltfl='tags')

but i didn't get any answer.

any help?



On Sun, Sep 6, 2015 at 9:20 AM, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> The closest thing to this I know of would be "more like this",
> you might want to take a look at that capability:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/MoreLikeThis
>
> Best,
> Erick
>
> On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 11:29 PM, sara hajili <hajili.s...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > hi
> > i have a social app and i wanna to index all people posts.
> > in this case i index post data like :
> > title,images,tags,caption,comment,like counts,etc
> > and i need to search on tag"people tags on their post ,this tags are
> > related to their post"
> > i am willing to undrestand that solr know any relational bettwen tags?!!
> > "i know we can set filter to set synonym of a search clause ,and for
> > example if people search football ,(if in synonym file i set
> > "football"="soccer") solr search on football and soccer.
> > i need to know solr can underestand other relational between tags??
> > i mean solr now about companion relation betwwen tags?!!
> > see this:
> > if  i have tags in solr "football,sport,cr7"
> > and in many  tags in solr doc football and sport come to gether.
> > if user search sport,
> > solr underestand that search about sport and football together("because
> > football and sport come together more and more in docs,so solr must
> > conclude that sport and football have comparison relational,so search on
> > both of them ")??
> > so solr know that?if no how implement this?
> > or if yes.how i use this feature?
> > tnx.
>

Reply via email to