Do you use master-slave or SolrCloud for that single shard? Erick suggest that I can still can use SolrCloud for HA/DR purpose cause Zookeeper can do the work for me. Should I just give up master-slave choice even there's only one single shard?
Scott Chu，scott....@udngroup.com 2015/9/3 ----- Original Message ----- From: Toke Eskildsen To: solr-user Date: 2015-09-03, 17:46:22 Subject: Re: Re: concept and choice: custom sharding or auto sharding? On Wed, 2015-09-02 at 08:30 -0700, Erick Erickson wrote: > Because I routinely see 50M docs on a single node and I've seen over 300M docs > on a single node with sub-second responses. For what it's worth, we also do article-based search of newspaper based material (old OCR'ed papers). We use a single replicated shard for that and it works fine (response times < 1s for 98.5% of the searches), with faceting on 4 fields as well as grouping. There are 66M articles in a 340GB shard. It is always hard to compare indexes, but I agree with Erick that having performance problems with 10M documents calls for locating the bottlenecks, before trying to scale the problem away. - Toke Eskildsen, State and University Library, Denmark ----- 未在此訊息中找到病毒。 已透過 AVG 檢查 - www.avg.com 版本: 2015.0.6086 / 病毒庫: 4409/10564 - 發佈日期: 09/02/15
