On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 11:11 AM, Tom Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I wanted to use the new dismax support for more like this described in > SOLR-295 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-295> but can't even get > the new syntax for dismax to work (described in > SOLR-281<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-281>). > Any ideas if this functionality works? > > Here's the relevant part of my solr config, > > <requestHandler name="/genre" class="solr.StandardRequestHandler" > defType="dismax">
defType is just another parameter and should appear in the defaults section below. -Yonik > <lst name="defaults"> > <str name="echoParams">explicit</str> > <float name="tie">0.01</float> > <str name="qf"> > relatedExact^2 genre^0.5 > </str> > <int name="ps">100</int> > <str name="q.alt">*:*</str> > </lst> > </requestHandler> > > Example query: > http://localhost:13280/solr/genre?indent=on&version=2.2&q=terrence+howard&start=0&rows=10&fl=*%2Cscore&wt=standard&debugQuery=on&explainOther=&hl.fl= > > Debug output: (I would expect to see dismax scoring) > > <str name="Contributor8843"> > 11.151003 = (MATCH) sum of: > 6.925395 = (MATCH) weight(name:terrence in 63941), product of: > 0.7880709 = queryWeight(name:terrence), product of: > 10.0431795 = idf(docFreq=234, numDocs=1988249) > 0.07846827 = queryNorm > 8.787782 = (MATCH) fieldWeight(name:terrence in 63941), product of: > 1.0 = tf(termFreq(name:terrence)=1) > 10.0431795 = idf(docFreq=234, numDocs=1988249) > 0.875 = fieldNorm(field=name, doc=63941) > 4.2256074 = (MATCH) weight(name:howard in 63941), product of: > 0.6155844 = queryWeight(name:howard), product of: > 7.84501 = idf(docFreq=2116, numDocs=1988249) > 0.07846827 = queryNorm > 6.8643837 = (MATCH) fieldWeight(name:howard in 63941), product of: > 1.0 = tf(termFreq(name:howard)=1) > 7.84501 = idf(docFreq=2116, numDocs=1988249) > 0.875 = fieldNorm(field=name, doc=63941) > > > Here's my build info: > Solr Specification Version: 1.2.2008.06.02.15.21.48 > Solr Implementation Version: 1.3-dev 662524M - tsmorton - 2008-06-02 > 15:21:48 > > Is this feature now broken or does it look like my config is wrong? > > Thanks...Tom >
