Why do you think this is desirable? Unless something is wrong somewhere, i.e. nodes go into recovery regularly, there is no replication in SolrCloud. The original docs are forwarded to each replica in a shard, _not_ the final indexed format.
If you're seeing a lot of recoveries, then _that's_ the problem you should be addressing. In the normal state, adding compression to replication is probably not a good use of time. And the very _first_ thing I'd do is see what kind of compression you get on a Lucene index. There's already been quite a bit of work to make the data structures compact. The stored data (*.fdt) files are _already_ compressed. Best, Erick On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 1:01 AM, Gopal Jee <zgo...@gmail.com> wrote: > I am using solrcloud version 4.10.1. As of now, our replication handler is > configured as: > <requestHandler name="/replication" class="solr.ReplicationHandler" > startup="lazy"> > </requestHandler> > > I want to add compression to index replication. On web, i found ways to add > compression for master/slave. How do i add compression to replication > handler in solrcloud deployment. > > --
