How soon? And will you be able to use them for querying, or just faceting/sorting/displaying?
Thx! Upayavira On Fri, Jul 31, 2015, at 09:27 PM, Erick Erickson wrote: > And coming soon will be docvalues field updates that don't require > reindexing the whole doc. > > Best, > Erick > On Jul 31, 2015 6:51 AM, "Upayavira" <u...@odoko.co.uk> wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2015, at 07:29 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote: > > > On 7/30/2015 10:46 AM, Robert Farrior wrote: > > > > We have a requirement to be able to have a master product catalog and > > to > > > > create a sub-catalog of products per user. This means I may have 10,000 > > > > users who each create their own list of documents. This is a simple > > mapping > > > > of user to documents. The full data about the documents would be in > > the main > > > > catalog. > > > > > > > > What approaches would allow Solr to only return the results that are > > in the > > > > user's list? It seems like I would need a couple of steps in the > > process. > > > > In other words, the main catalog has 3 documents: A, B and C. I have 2 > > > > users. User 1 has access to documents A and C but not B. User 2 has > > access > > > > to documents C and B but not A. > > > > > > > > When a user searches, I want to only return documents that the user has > > > > access to. > > > > > > A common approach for Solr would be to have a multivalued "user" field > > > on each document, which has individual values for each user that can > > > access the document. When you index the document, you included values > > > in this field listing all the users that can access that document. > > > > > > Then you simply filter by user: > > > > > > fq=user:joe > > > > > > This is EXTREMELY efficient at query time, especially when the number of > > > users is much smaller than the number of documents. It may complicate > > > indexing somewhat, but indexing is an extremely custom operation that > > > users have to write themselves, so it probably won't be horrible. > > > > Things to consider: > > > > * How often are documents assigned to new users? > > * How many documents does a user typically have? > > * Do you have a 'trigger' in your app that tells you a user has been > > assigned > > a new doc? > > > > You can use a pseudo join to implement this sort of thing - have a > > different core that contains the 'permissions', either a document that > > says "this document ID is accessible via these users" or "this user is > > allowed to see these document IDs". You are keeping your fast moving > > (authorization) data separate from your slow moving (the docs > > themselves) data. > > > > You can then say "find me all documents that are accessible via user X" > > > > Upayavira > >
