Hi Eric,
By compressed value I meant value of a field after removing special characters 
. In my example its "-". Compressed form of red-apple is redapple .

I wanted to know if we can see the analyzed version of fields .

For example if I use ngram on a field , how do I see the analyzed values in 
index ?


 

-----Original Message-----
From: "Erick Erickson" <erickerick...@gmail.com>
Sent: ‎29-‎06-‎2015 18:12
To: "solr-user@lucene.apache.org" <solr-user@lucene.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Reading indexed data from solr 5.1.0 using admin/luke?

Not quite sure what you mean by "compressed values". admin/luke
doesn't show the results of the compression of the stored values, there's
no way I know of to do that.

Best,
Erick

On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 8:20 AM, dinesh naik <dineshkumarn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Is there a way to read the indexed data for field on which the
> analysis/processing  has been done ?
>
> I know using admin GUI we can see field wise analysis But how can i get
> hold on the complete document using admin/luke? or any other way?
>
> For example, if i have 2 fields called name and compressedname.
>
> name has values like apple, green-apple,red-apple
> compressedname has values like apple,greenapple,redapple
>
> Even though i make both these field indexed=true and stored=true
>
> I am not able to see the compressed values using admin/luke?id=<mydocid>
>
> in response i see something like this-
>
>
> <lst name="name ">
> <str name="type">string</str>
> <str name="schema">ITS--------------</str>
> <str name="flags">ITS--------------</str>
> <str name="value">GREEN-APPLE</str>
> <str name="internal">GREEN-APPLE</str>
> <float name="boost">1.0</float>
> <int name="docFreq">0</int>
> </lst>
> <lst name="compressedname">
> <str name="type">string</str>
> <str name="schema">ITS--------------</str>
> <str name="flags">ITS--------------</str>
> <str name="value">GREEN-APPLE</str>
> <str name="internal">GREEN-APPLE</str>
> <float name="boost">1.0</float>
> <int name="docFreq">0</int>
> </lst>
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Dinesh Naik

Reply via email to