Thank you Erick!

I'll use the internal Jetty and start Solr with the bin/solr start scripts.


Regards,
Edwin


On 26 May 2015 at 12:20, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Actually, just use the new bin/solr start scripts and ignore whether
> it's running Jetty under the covers or not I think.
>
> Best,
> Erick
>
> On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 7:11 PM, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo
> <edwinye...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Shawn,
> >
> > Thanks for your reply. So the recommendation is still to stick with the
> > Jetty that's included in Solr?
> >
> > From what you say, seems that if we use external Jetty, we have to do
> more
> > configuration to tune it to fit Solr, and it will probably use more
> memory
> > and run slower too.There might also be issues with a future release of
> Solr.
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Edwin
> >
> >
> > On 25 May 2015 at 21:51, Shawn Heisey <apa...@elyograg.org> wrote:
> >
> >> On 5/25/2015 3:28 AM, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo wrote:
> >> > I understand that Jetty comes together with the Solr installation
> >> package,
> >> > and that by default, Solr uses Jetty internally to power it's HTTP
> stack.
> >> >
> >> > Would like to check, will there be any performance difference when we
> run
> >> > the Jetty internally as compared to running an external copy of
> Jetty? I
> >> > have heard of source saying that the performance will be better if we
> run
> >> > on external copy. Is that true?
> >>
> >> The config for the included Jetty has had a small amount of tuning done
> >> specifically for Solr.  You would lose that if you switched.  Also, the
> >> Jetty included with Solr has had a bunch of the jars and their
> >> configuration stripped out.  That makes it use less memory, and likely
> >> run a little bit faster.
> >>
> >> > Also, as support for deploying Solr as a WAR in standalone servlet
> >> > containers like Jetty is no longer supported from Solr 5.0, is it
> still
> >> > possible to deploy Solr using an external copy of Jetty?
> >>
> >> Although we don't recommend it, for now you can find the .war file in
> >> the download and deploy it in other containers.  That will be changing
> >> in a future release, but we don't have an ETA.  There is a wiki page
> >> discussing the situation.  It is still a work in progress:
> >>
> >> https://wiki.apache.org/solr/WhyNoWar
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Shawn
> >>
> >>
>

Reply via email to