I don't have a need for Edismax. That said, do I still have a need for copyField into a default-field?
Steve On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Alessandro Benedetti < benedetti.ale...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think with a proper configuration of the Edismax query parser and a > proper management of field boosting, > > it's much more precise to use the list of interesting fields than a big > blob copy field. > > Cheers > > 2015-05-13 15:54 GMT+01:00 Steven White <swhite4...@gmail.com>: > > > Hi Everyone, > > > > In my search need, I will always be using df to specify the list of > fields > > a search will be done in (the list of fields is group based which my > > application defines). > > > > Given this, is there any reason to use copyField to copy the data into a > > single master-field to search against? Am I losing any thing by not > using > > copyField? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Steve > > > > > > -- > -------------------------- > > Benedetti Alessandro > Visiting card : http://about.me/alessandro_benedetti > > "Tyger, tyger burning bright > In the forests of the night, > What immortal hand or eye > Could frame thy fearful symmetry?" > > William Blake - Songs of Experience -1794 England >
