On Mon, 2015-05-11 at 05:48 +0000, Abhishek Gupta wrote: > According to this there are 137 records. Now I am faceting over these 137 > records with facet.method=fc. Ideally it should just iterate over these 137 > records and sub up the facets.
That is only the ideal method if you are not planning on issuing subsequent calls: facet.method=fc does more work up front to ensure that later calls are fast. > http://localhost:9020/search/p1-umShard-1/select?q=*:*& > fq=(msgType:38+AND+snCreatedTime:[2015-04-15T00:00:00Z%20TO%20*])& > facet.field=conversationId&facet=true&indent=on&wt=json&rows=0& > facet.method=fc&debug=timing > { > > - responseHeader: > { > - status: 0, > - QTime: 395103 > }, [...] > According to this faceting is taking 395036 time. Why its taking *395 > seconds* to just calculate facets of 137 records? 6½ minute is a long time, even for first call. Do you have tens to hundreds of millions of documents in your index? Or do you have a similiar amount of unique values in your facet? Either way, subsequent faceting calls should be much faster and a switch to DocValues should lower your first-call time significantly. Toke Eskildsen, State and University Library, Denmark