Hi,
If adding PhraseQuery objects does not work, then using SpanNearQuery with
slop 0 and order true for p1 and p2 should work (tried).
Dmitry
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 8:43 PM, Sujit Pal <sujit....@comcast.net> wrote:
> Hi Vijay,
>
> I haven't tried this myself, but perhaps you could build the two phrases as
> PhraseQueries and connect them up with a SpanQuery? Something like this
> (using your original example).
>
> PhraseQuery p1 = new PhraseQuery();
> for (String word : "this is phrase 1".split()) {
> ....p1.add(new Term("my_field", word));
> }
> PhraseQuery p2 = new PhraseQuery();
> for (String word : "this is the second phrase".split()) {
> ....p2.add(new Term("my_field", word));
> }
> SpanQuery q = new SpanNearQuery(new SpanQuery[] {p1, p2}, 4, true);
>
> -sujit
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Vijaya Narayana Reddy Bhoomi Reddy <
> vijaya.bhoomire...@whishworks.com> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Rajani.
> >
> > I could get proximity search work for individual words. However, still
> > could not make it work for two phrases, each containing more than a word.
> > Also, results seem to be unexpected for proximity queries with wildcards.
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks & Regards
> > Vijay
> >
> >
> > On 30 April 2015 at 15:19, Rajani Maski <rajani.ma...@lucidworks.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Vijaya,
> > >
> > > I just quickly tried proximity search with the example set shipped with
> > > solr 5 and it looked like working for me.
> > > Perhaps, what you could is debug the query by enabling debugQuery=true.
> > >
> > >
> > > Here are the steps that I tried.(Assuming you are on Solr 5. Though
> this
> > > term proximity functionality should work for 4.x versions too)
> > >
> > > 1. Go to solr5.0 downloaded folder and navigate to bin.
> > >
> > > Rajanis-MacBook-Pro:solr-5.0.0 rajanishivarajmaski$ bin/solr -e
> > > techproducts
> > >
> > > 2. Execute the below query. The field "name" has value "Test with some
> > > GB18030 encoded characters" and you search for name: "Test
> GB18030"~10
> > >
> > > http://localhost:8983/solr/techproducts/select?q=name: "Test
> > > GB18030"~10&wt=json&indent=true
> > >
> > > Image : http://postimg.org/image/bjkbufsph/
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 7:14 PM, Vijaya Narayana Reddy Bhoomi Reddy <
> > > vijaya.bhoomire...@whishworks.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I just tried with simple proximity search like "word1 word2" ~3 and
> it
> > is
> > > > not working. Just wondering whether I have to make any configuration
> > > > changes to solrconfig.xml to make proximity search work?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > > Vijay
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 30 April 2015 at 14:32, Vijaya Narayana Reddy Bhoomi Reddy <
> > > > vijaya.bhoomire...@whishworks.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > I have created my index with the default configurations. Now I am
> > > trying
> > > > > to use proximity search. However, I am bit not sure on the results
> > and
> > > > > where its going wrong.
> > > > >
> > > > > For example, I want to find two phrases "this is phrase one" and
> > > another
> > > > > phrase "this is the second phrase" with not more than a proximity
> > > > distance
> > > > > of 4 words in between them. The query syntax I am using is "(\"this
> > is
> > > > > phrase one\") (\"this is the second phrase\")"~4
> > > > >
> > > > > However, the results I am getting are similar to OR operation. Can
> > > anyone
> > > > > please let me know whether the syntax is correct?
> > > > >
> > > > > Also, please let me know how to implement proximity search using
> > SolrJ
> > > > > Query API?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks & Regards
> > > > > Vijay
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > The contents of this e-mail are confidential and for the exclusive
> use
> > of
> > > > the intended recipient. If you receive this e-mail in error please
> > delete
> > > > it from your system immediately and notify us either by e-mail or
> > > > telephone. You should not copy, forward or otherwise disclose the
> > content
> > > > of the e-mail. The views expressed in this communication may not
> > > > necessarily be the view held by WHISHWORKS.
> > > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > The contents of this e-mail are confidential and for the exclusive use of
> > the intended recipient. If you receive this e-mail in error please delete
> > it from your system immediately and notify us either by e-mail or
> > telephone. You should not copy, forward or otherwise disclose the content
> > of the e-mail. The views expressed in this communication may not
> > necessarily be the view held by WHISHWORKS.
> >
>
--
Dmitry Kan
Luke Toolbox: http://github.com/DmitryKey/luke
Blog: http://dmitrykan.blogspot.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/dmitrykan
SemanticAnalyzer: www.semanticanalyzer.info
