Thanks Matt and Yavar for the suggestion. Now I have fixed the issue.
For others benefit, the issue was with defining the fields as String. Now I changed them to text_general. Also, instead of indexing these individual fields, I created corresponding copyFields for each of them, where dest field is set to text. This fixed the issue. Thanks for your help!! Thanks & Regards Vijay On 20 April 2015 at 17:11, Yavar Husain <yavarhus...@gmail.com> wrote: > There might be issues with your default search field. Suppose if you are > searching field named "MyTestField" then give your query as > MyTestField:Birmingham > and see if you get any results. As Matt suggested there might be some > issues with the way you have done tokenization/analysis etc. > > > > On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 9:21 PM, Matt Kuiper <matt.kui...@issinc.com> > wrote: > > > What type of field are you using? String? If so try another type, like > > text_general. > > > > I believe with type String the contents are stored in the index exactly > as > > they are inputted into the index. So a search hit will have to match > > exactly the full value of the field, I assume in your case "Birmingham" > is > > only part of the value. With text_general and other types, the value > will > > be tokenized and allow for hits on parts or variants of the value. > > > > Matt > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Vijaya Narayana Reddy Bhoomi Reddy [mailto: > > vijaya.bhoomire...@whishworks.com] > > Sent: Monday, April 20, 2015 9:31 AM > > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > > Subject: Search in Solr Index > > > > Hi, > > > > I am indexing some data from a Database. Data is getting indexed properly > > and when I query in the Solr stock UI with query parameters as *.*, I > could > > see the documents with all the fields listed and as well the numFound > > reflecting properly. However, if I perform a query with a simple string > > for example "Birmingham", numFound returns 0 with no records to be > > displayed. There are records which are indexed that contains fields with > > the text "Birmingham". In the schema.xml, all the fields have been > defined > > as indexed="true" and stored="true" > > > > This is happening for any search query string. What could be the reason > > for this behavior? > > > > > > Thanks & Regards > > Vijay > > > > -- > > The contents of this e-mail are confidential and for the exclusive use of > > the intended recipient. If you receive this e-mail in error please delete > > it from your system immediately and notify us either by e-mail or > > telephone. You should not copy, forward or otherwise disclose the content > > of the e-mail. The views expressed in this communication may not > > necessarily be the view held by WHISHWORKS. > > > -- The contents of this e-mail are confidential and for the exclusive use of the intended recipient. If you receive this e-mail in error please delete it from your system immediately and notify us either by e-mail or telephone. You should not copy, forward or otherwise disclose the content of the e-mail. The views expressed in this communication may not necessarily be the view held by WHISHWORKS.
