Great!! Thank you very much. On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 7:36 PM, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Solr/Lucene are supposed to _always_ read one major version back. Thus > your 4.10 should be able to read indexes produced all the way back to > (and including) 3.x. Sometimes "experimental" formats are excepted. > > In your case you should be fine since you're upgrading from 4.8.. > > As always, though, I'd recommend copying your indexes someplace just > to be paranoid before upgrading. > > Best, > Erick > > On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 10:28 AM, Vincenzo D'Amore <v.dam...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Thanks for your answers, I looked at changes and we don't use > > DocValuesFormat. > > The question is, if I upgrade the SolrCloud version to 4.10, should I > > reload entirely all documents? > > Is there a binary compatibility between these two versions reading the > > solar home? > > > > On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 7:04 PM, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com > > > > wrote: > > > >> Look at CHANGES.txt for both Lucene and Solr, there's always an > >> "upgrading" section for each release. > >> > >> Best, > >> Erick > >> > >> On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 5:31 AM, Toke Eskildsen <t...@statsbiblioteket.dk > > > >> wrote: > >> > Vincenzo D'Amore <v.dam...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> I have a SolrCloud cluster with 3 server, I would like to use > >> stats.facet, > >> >> but this feature is available only if I upgrade to 4.10. > >> > > >> >> May I simply redeploy new solr cloud version in tomcat or should > reload > >> all > >> >> the documents? > >> >> There are other drawbacks? > >> > > >> > Support for the Disk-format for DocValues was removed after 4.8, so > you > >> should check if you use that: DocValuesFormat="Disk" for the field in > the > >> schema, if I remember correctly. > >> > > >> > - Toke Eskildsen > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Vincenzo D'Amore > > email: v.dam...@gmail.com > > skype: free.dev > > mobile: +39 349 8513251 > -- Vincenzo D'Amore email: v.dam...@gmail.com skype: free.dev mobile: +39 349 8513251
